Teams

Ra.Mills40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 7.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-11vs Hol.Camak40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Michelle Welborn vs Mary Cockrill / Chandler Bastian6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNoelle Jackson / Kristen Wassel vs Wendy Burkard / Karen Gupton6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRachel Mills / Erin Conigliaro vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-10-09vs Le.Corn40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Noelle Jackson vs Andrea McCartney / Sherry Ingle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Lynda Blelloch vs Melissa Liner / Leslie Corn5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer McCown / Kylie Harris vs Alexis Johnson / Tracey Carlin2-6, 1-6
2024-10-04vs Yv.Barrow40C7.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Michelle Welborn vs Rebecca Bennett / Mary Dee Smith6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKristen Wassel / Laurie Parker vs Yvonne Barrow / Cameron Ellerbe6-4, 7-6
2024-09-25vs An.Kinlaw40CWon 20
W#1 DoublesHelen Harris / Kimberley Matthews vs Danielle Stringer / Julie Leon6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Stacey Jacobs vs Carol Muth / Kim Peters6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-20vs St.Rabby40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichelle Welborn / Rebecca Sears vs Dana Weiland / Stephanie Rabby3-6, 2-6
2024-09-06vs Ch.Bason40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Conigliaro / Lynda Blelloch vs Allison Graves / Christina Jenkins7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRebecca Sears / Kristen Wassel vs KATRINA SIZEMORE / Jennifer Holloman1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKimberley Matthews / Stacey Jacobs vs Chris Bason / Elise Hamilton6-0, 6-7, 1-0
2024-08-23vs La.Capps40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesNoelle Jackson / Michelle Welborn vs Sharon Baggett / Allison Crumpler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRebecca Procter / Laurie Parker vs Stephanie Disbrow / Meghan Yancey2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Noelle Jackson
published
3.71
Erin Conigliaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Kimberley Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.48
Rebecca Sears
published
3.46
Rebecca Procter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Helen Harris
published
3.40
Kristen Wassel
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Michelle Welborn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.26
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.23
Laurie Parker
published
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
published
2.97
Jennifer McCown
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Procter + Kimberley Matthews2647% gamesnot enough data
Erin Conigliaro + Michelle Welborn314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer McCown + Stacey Jacobs224 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Parker + Stacey Jacobs213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
4
Erin Conigliaro
175W–128L career · 6 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Kimberley Matthews
137W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Rebecca Sears
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
56%44%<1%
3.48
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 3 lines in 2024
62%38%<1%
3.46
Helen Harris
13W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Kristen Wassel
128W–83L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Michelle Welborn
140W–117L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.26
Laurie Parker
11W–12L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Lynda Blelloch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer McCown
67W–91L career · 1 line in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.