Teams

WALNUT CREEK RC/Walnut Creek TC 18AM4.0A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 4.0

23 players · average NTRP 3.72 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Arjun P
published 4
3.74
Eugene Beyder
published
3.72
Brian Kuritsubo
published 4
3.66
Jacob Roig
published
3.62
Michael O'Hara
published
3.62
Thinh Vo
published
3.58
Samir Bhatnagar
published
3.54
Anand Sahasram
published 4
3.52
Robert Greer
published
3.50
Agung Zakaria
published 4
3.47
Vijaya Bhargava
published
3.47
Gabriel Ionita
published
3.45
Rajat Jain
published
3.43
3.42
Sujit Chakravorti
published
3.40
Shiv Sharma
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.14
Sterling Tai
published
3.11
Alexander Ard
published 3.5
3.09
Joel Schaffer
published 3.5
3.08
J Patrick Forden
published
Phillipe Oliveros
published
Thangavel Duraisamy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anand Sahasram + Rajat Jain2343% gamesnot enough data
Jacob Roig + Brian Kuritsubo213 matchesnot enough data
Joel Schaffer + Sreevisakh Muraleedharan123 matchesnot enough data
Agung Zakaria + Rajat Jain033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arjun P
6W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
Eugene Beyder
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Brian Kuritsubo
10W–2L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.72
Jacob Roig
10W–16L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
Michael O'Hara
9W–19L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Thinh Vo
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
3.62
Samir Bhatnagar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Anand Sahasram
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Robert Greer
16W–26L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Agung Zakaria
6W–23L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Vijaya Bhargava
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Gabriel Ionita
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Rajat Jain
5W–15L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Sreevisakh Muraleedharan
19W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
3.43
Sujit Chakravorti
9W–15L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Alaettin Altug Keciciler
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Shiv Sharma
69W–27L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sterling Tai
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.14
3.5
Alexander Ard
5W–14L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Joel Schaffer
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.09
J Patrick Forden
10W–21L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
Phillipe Oliveros
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thangavel Duraisamy
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.