Teams

OC Coto De Caza - Tammy

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-06vs OC FW Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 13
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Rachel McPheron vs Jodie Hoffman / Beth Hoss6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesTomoe Stevens vs Janna Canzone1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Beykpour / Megan Turnage vs Holly Ferber / Janna Lewis6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGwen Stavros / Madona Shaheen vs Laura Barron / Kiera McLane6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Danielle Futrell vs Emili Maljawskij / Stefanie Chang6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLauren Ramirez / Gwen Stavros vs Carla Affeld / Kristiana Anderson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGina Rindahl / Madona Shaheen vs Melissa Hinrichs / Christie Day6-2, 6-1
2025-05-09vs OC Nellie Gail - Lijuan - 930Won 40
W#1 DoublesCathy Field / Rachel Ashton vs Michelle Noel / Lisa Dooley6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTomoe Stevens vs Michelle Pautsch6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGwen Stavros / Rachel McPheron vs Emily Moradi / Patricia Chacon6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesShelly Carroll / Megan Turnage vs Arezoo Namazi / Desiree Zubair6-2, 6-1
2025-05-02vs OC Newport Beach TC - Katya/KimmyWon 40
W#1 DoublesTana Ashton / Danielle Futrell vs Kimberly Gambol / Shandon Smith6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesTomoe Stevens vs Lacy Alyn6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesGwen Stavros / Rachel Ashton vs Anna Riddlesperger / Elizabeth Warner6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadona Shaheen / Fiorella Villar vs Ashley Rose / Katherine Rennert6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tana Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.33
Megan Turnage
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Cathy Field
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Dana Orsini
published 3.5
3.31
Fiorella Villar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gwen Stavros
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.25
Rachel Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Shelly Carroll
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Madona Shaheen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Dianna Claton
published 3
3.17
Danielle Futrell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Tomoe Stevens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Christy Dodson
published 3.5
Gina Rindahl
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel McPheron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Tammy Beykpour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Field + Fiorella Villar213 matchesnot enough data
Megan Turnage + Rachel Ashton123 matchesnot enough data
Rachel Ashton + Tana Ashton303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tana Ashton
24W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Megan Turnage
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Cathy Field
16W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Fiorella Villar
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Gwen Stavros
8W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Rachel Ashton
7W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Shelly Carroll
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Madona Shaheen
18W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3
Dianna Claton
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%7%93%
3.21
3.5
Danielle Futrell
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Tomoe Stevens
15W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Christy Dodson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.04
Gina Rindahl
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel McPheron
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Beykpour
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.