Teams

OC The Tennis Club Newport Beach - Stephanie/Kareem

2025 Adult 18 & Over - WEEKDAY WOMEN -OC · OC 3.5W WD

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-06-13vs OC FW Mission Viejo CC - JannaLost 03
L#1 DoublesNayiri Alexander / Stefanie Chang vs Holly Cook / Holly Ferber0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTaylor Whittingham vs Jamie Andersen7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmili Maljawskij / Christie Day vs Jodie Hoffman / Laura Barron1-6, 0-6
2025-06-06vs OC Newport Beach TC - Katya/KimmyLost 02
L#1 DoublesEmili Maljawskij / Melissa Hinrichs vs Kimberly Gambol / Shandon Smith1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicole Conners / Christie Day vs Cristina Gabriel / Elizabeth Warner0-6, 2-6
2025-05-30vs OC Coto De Caza - TammyLost 03
L#1 DoublesEmili Maljawskij / Stefanie Chang vs Tana Ashton / Danielle Futrell1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCarla Affeld / Kristiana Anderson vs Lauren Ramirez / Gwen Stavros1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Hinrichs / Christie Day vs Gina Rindahl / Madona Shaheen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Kimberly Snyder
published
Carla Affeld
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Christie Day
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Emili Maljawskij
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kristiana Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Hinrichs
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Nayiri Alexander
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nicole Conners
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Stefanie Chang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Taylor Whittingham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Snyder
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Carla Affeld
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Christie Day
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Emili Maljawskij
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristiana Anderson
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Melissa Hinrichs
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nayiri Alexander
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nicole Conners
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Stefanie Chang
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Taylor Whittingham
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.