Teams

Caliente Jaquess M

2023 TRI-Level · Caliente 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs Caliente Fellowship MLost 12
L#1 DoublesTroy Wethe / Chad Kelley vs Mike Reichle / Richard Chamberlain6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesClaude Maraoui / Tyler McDonald vs Todd Lamb / Jeff Smith7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAl Haase / Russell Brooks vs Joshua Grabel / Marc Hawkins4-6, 6-7
2023-05-06vs Caliente LW MWon 30
W#1 DoublesTodd Snow / Troy Wethe vs Isaac Marshall / Kyle Bloomstadt6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDarryl Jaquess / Douglas Schreiber vs Jeffrey Marshall / Abrar Khan6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTroy Anderson / Daniel Best vs Jeff Bailey / Brad Charan7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-06vs PHX/LeClerc/TRI/4.5-4.0-3.5/MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Snow / Chad Kelley vs Karl Leclerc / Adam Draper4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDouglas Schreiber / Claude Maraoui vs Jeremy Loeb / Naveen Mathew4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Best / Al Haase vs William Korbin / Tony Villarreal1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-06vs Caliente Friedman MLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Snow / Chad Kelley vs Kevin Tuhy / Aditya Sharma6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTyler McDonald / Darryl Jaquess vs Jonathan Friedman / Robert Keil5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRussell Brooks / Troy Anderson vs Kyle Lametti / Rene Matusiak3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Caliente 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Tyler McDonald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.93
Troy Wethe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Todd Snow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Claude Maraoui
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Chad Kelley
published 4
3.74
Douglas Schreiber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Darryl Jaquess
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Daniel Best
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Al Haase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Russell Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Troy Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Douglas Schreiber + Darryl Jaquess7457% games+1.9% vs expected
Douglas Schreiber + Claude Maraoui044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tyler McDonald
120W–88L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
4.06
Troy Wethe
47W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.93
Todd Snow
85W–81L career · 3 lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.91
4
Claude Maraoui
92W–52L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Chad Kelley
45W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Douglas Schreiber
217W–100L career · 2 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Darryl Jaquess
73W–53L career · 2 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Daniel Best
106W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Al Haase
99W–133L career · 2 lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
3.14
Russell Brooks
110W–66L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Troy Anderson
54W–47L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.