Teams

PHX/LeClerc/TRI/4.5-4.0-3.5/M

2023 TRI-Level · Caliente 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-07vs Caliente LW MWon 20
W#2 DoublesMatthew Jackson / Naveen Mathew vs Tony Garcia / Andrew Liao6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichael DiPaolo / James Redpath vs Jeff Bailey / Kevin Taylor6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-07vs Caliente Friedman MWon 30
W#1 DoublesKyle Ogren / Benjamin Lahren vs Brian Wong / Harold Dilema6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeremy Loeb / Matthew Jackson vs Jeremy Barnhart / Jonathan Friedman6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichael DiPaolo / William Korbin vs KEVIN STEVERSON / Rene Matusiak6-2, 6-3
2023-05-06vs Caliente Jaquess MWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarl Leclerc / Adam Draper vs Todd Snow / Chad Kelley6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJeremy Loeb / Naveen Mathew vs Douglas Schreiber / Claude Maraoui6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Korbin / Tony Villarreal vs Daniel Best / Al Haase6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2023-05-05vs Caliente Fellowship MWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarl Leclerc / Kyle Ogren vs Jerod Adkins / Mike Reichle6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNaveen Mathew / Jeremy Loeb vs Chad Clark / Jeff Smith6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTony Villarreal / James Redpath vs Scott Burdick / Rudy Dudebout1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Caliente 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Benjamin Lahren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Adam Draper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Naveen Mathew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.94
Matthew Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
William Korbin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.49
James Redpath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Tony Villarreal
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jeremy Loeb
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karl Leclerc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Ogren
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael DiPaolo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naveen Mathew + Matthew Jackson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Benjamin Lahren
11W–3L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%78%22%
4.40
4.5
Adam Draper
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Naveen Mathew
77W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.95
Matthew Jackson
124W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.94
William Korbin
110W–34L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
3.5
James Redpath
78W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
Tony Villarreal
83W–114L career · 2 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
Jeremy Loeb
42W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karl Leclerc
81W–24L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kyle Ogren
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael DiPaolo
101W–126L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.