Teams

OC Just For Fun - LPC - Mak Sat11

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesHye Jin Robertson / Sandeep Singh vs Nancy Casey / Aaron Robles6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2023-03-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPeter Bui / Teresa Campbell vs Yang Shen / Yim Ying Lily Li3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2023-03-04vs OC LPC - Lee Sun3pmLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Mak / Khin Aye vs Lee Nguyen / Lisa Nguyen2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSandeep Singh / Hye Jin Robertson vs Christopher Contreras / Gia Bao Le4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPeter Bui / Maria Pearson vs Vincent Keeler / Demi Dang2-6, 1-6
2023-02-11vs OC Coto De Caza - Keith Sun10Won 10
W#1 DoublesValentina Stepanova / Daniel Siow vs Ulrike Leivici / Rob Hedayati6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesValentina Stepanova / Daniel Siow vs Daniel Beres / Theresa Jeong5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDavid Mak / Meghan Lake vs Robert Samson / Meera Shier3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.22
Valentina Stepanova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Hye Jin Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.77
Daniel Siow
published 4
3.76
David Mak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Teresa Campbell
published
3.72
Meghan Lake
published
3.70
Julie Mak
published
3.60
Khin Aye
published
3.50
Peter Bui
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Kristi Wechsler
published
Rafael Nieto
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Mak + Hye Jin Robertson1446% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
4.44
4.5
Valentina Stepanova
172W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
4.5
Hye Jin Robertson
160W–80L career · 2 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Daniel Siow
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
David Mak
77W–79L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.76
Teresa Campbell
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Meghan Lake
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
Julie Mak
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.70
Khin Aye
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
Peter Bui
104W–62L career · 2 lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Kristi Wechsler
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Rafael Nieto
15W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.