Teams

OC Orange Crush - Monarch TC - Dane Sun10am

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

19 players · average NTRP 4.29 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-02vs OC Coto De Caza - Keith Sun10Won 20
W#1 DoublesMeera Shier / Noh Jin Park vs Gary Renko / Lori McFerren6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFrank Gagnon / Danielle D'Amico vs Alexis Braun / Anthony Bertocchini6-2, 6-1
2023-03-26vs SoCal/Tran/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Vangelos / Ayako Hasegawa vs Sohee Ki / Thach Ian Phan6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle D'Amico / Frank Gagnon vs Ted Pham / Robin Briones6-2, 6-1
2023-02-19vs OC Meta Legend - LPC - Gu Sun11Won 10
W#2 DoublesTommy Cramer / Eileen MacKenzie vs Jerry Li / Kirtine Yang6-3, 6-2
W#1 DoublesAyako Hasegawa / Noh Jin Park vs Heidi Schuler / Jun Yuan6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMeera Shier / Robert Samson vs Yoko Ohigashi / Mahito Mori6-2, 6-2
2023-01-29vs OC LPC - Lee Sun3pmWon 10
W#3 DoublesTommy Cramer / Eileen MacKenzie vs Chloe Kishel / Christopher Contreras6-4, 6-1
2023-01-22vs OC Just For Fun - LPC - Mak Sat11Won 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Beres / Theresa Jeong vs Valentina Stepanova / Daniel Siow7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrian Richardson / Ayako Hasegawa vs Teresa Campbell / Jeffrey Campbell6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Samson / Meera Shier vs David Mak / Meghan Lake6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.01 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Danielle D'Amico
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
4.28
Daniel Beres
published 4.5
4.24
Mina Whitlock
published 4.5
4.07
Noh Jin Park
published
4.02
Theresa Jeong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Eileen MacKenzie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.96
Bart Vandesande
published 4
3.95
Brian Richardson
published 4.5
3.93
Meera Shier
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.88
Andrew Hedges
published 4
3.87
Ayako Hasegawa
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.86
Jaala Zabrocki
published 4
3.84
Luna Qingyue Cai
published
3.73
Tommy Cramer
published
3.73
Robert Samson
published
Nicole Doan
published
Scott Frick
published
Stephen Vangelos
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Hedges + Nicole Doan4155% gamesnot enough data
Ayako Hasegawa + Bart Vandesande314 matchesnot enough data
Ayako Hasegawa + Tommy Cramer213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Samson + Meera Shier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Danielle D'Amico
91W–45L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
4.5
Daniel Beres
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Mina Whitlock
121W–51L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.24
Noh Jin Park
13W–13L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
4.07
4.5
Theresa Jeong
83W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Eileen MacKenzie
86W–29L career · 2 lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.01
4
Bart Vandesande
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.96
4.5
Brian Richardson
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
3.95
4
Meera Shier
64W–51L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Andrew Hedges
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
3.88
4
Ayako Hasegawa
64W–28L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Jaala Zabrocki
12W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.86
Luna Qingyue Cai
10W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%11%
3.84
Tommy Cramer
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Robert Samson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
Nicole Doan
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Frick
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stephen Vangelos
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.