Teams

SoCal/Tran/Mixed18&Over8.0

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

16 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-03-12vs OC Team Courage -LPC - Nisha Sun11Lost 01
L#3 DoublesFrancesco Nguyen / Jenniffer Wong vs Nisha Anish / Abhishek Nisha Anish1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-02-18vs OC Just For Fun - LPC - Mak Sat11Won 20
W#1 DoublesKristina Ebon / Edmund Hsu vs Daniel Siow / Khin Aye6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDean Ho / Hatty Yip vs Rafael Nieto / Kristi Wechsler7-5, 6-2
2023-01-28vs OC Meta Legend - LPC - Gu Sun11Won 10
W#2 DoublesEdmund Hsu / Kristina Ebon vs Wenli Chen / Zhihao Mai6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.70
Karen Trinh
published
4.66
Dean Ho
published 5
4.65
Kyle Vo
published
4.52
Kristina Ebon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.46
Jinna Johnson
published
4.37
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
4.27
Francesco Nguyen
published
4.22
Edmund Hsu
published
4.13
Hatty Yip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.98
Frank Tran
published
3.97
Sohee Ki
published
3.81
Tajoe Lun
published
3.63
Thach Ian Phan
published
3.48
Anh Vo
published 3.5
3.33
Jenniffer Wong
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Eugene Nguyen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Trinh
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.70
5
Dean Ho
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.66
Kyle Vo
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.65
5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · 6 lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.52
Jinna Johnson
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
Francesco Nguyen
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.27
Edmund Hsu
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
4.22
4
Hatty Yip
99W–33L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%18%82%
4.13
Frank Tran
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Sohee Ki
14W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.97
Tajoe Lun
13W–5L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
3.81
Thach Ian Phan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Anh Vo
14W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2023
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Jenniffer Wong
200W–169L career · 1 line in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Eugene Nguyen
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.