Teams

OC Tennis Lovers - LPC Diekneit Sat 11am

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-01vs OC Meta Legend - LPC - Gu Sun11Split 11
W#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Jun Yuan vs Yim Ying Lily Li / Jerry Li6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Jay Gardner vs Chunyan Chen / Michael Gu3-6, 2-6
2023-03-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Jay Gardner vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesHeidi Schuler / Jun Yuan vs Ayako Hasegawa / Noh Jin Park1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Mahito Mori vs Meera Shier / Robert Samson2-6, 2-6
2023-02-04vs OC LPC - Lee Sun3pmSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Jason Hall vs Lisa Nguyen / Jim Chao2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Yasuhiko Fukumoto vs Gia Bao Le / Mathew Gonzales2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-21vs SoCal/Tran/Mixed18&Over8.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesYoko Ohigashi / Yasuhiko Fukumoto vs Caroline Tran / Francesco Nguyen3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Jay Gardner vs Ai-Vy Nguyen / Kyle Vo3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC - 8.0 WE - Weekend Mixed Doubles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Heidi Schuler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Miho Mori
published
3.65
Yoko Ohigashi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Kelly Hogan
published
3.53
Dana McCaulley
published 4
3.48
Jun Yuan
published
3.29
Sharon Diekneit
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Jay Gardner
published
Ken Meyer
published
Sheri Hall
published
Wesley Hall
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heidi Schuler
117W–78L career · 2 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
4.11
Miho Mori
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Yoko Ohigashi
82W–87L career · 3 lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.65
Kelly Hogan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Dana McCaulley
2W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
Jun Yuan
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Sharon Diekneit
185W–204L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
Jay Gardner
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Ken Meyer
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheri Hall
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wesley Hall
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.