Teams

MPTC - Wolverine

2026 HTA Spring NA - Men's Singles Monday · 4.5  Men's Singles

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-03-09vs HFTC - ZealotsWon 30
W#1 SinglesJoshua Minns vs Alex Bianca6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesDavid Kolacny vs Diego Rafael Santos6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMarco A Sandoval vs Sasan Ziatabar6-3, 6-4
2026-03-02vs LLTC - Quick SilverWon 40
W#1 SinglesJoshua Minns vs HAI DONG NGUYEN6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDavid Kolacny vs Victor Lee6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAntonio Bucarizza vs Sylvester Mayfield6-2, 6-0
W#4 SinglesKengo Takishima vs Javier Bustos6-3, 6-3
2026-02-23vs MPTC - Good GuysSplit 22
W#1 SinglesJoshua Minns vs Alexander Lyew6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesMitchell Kreider vs Diego Martinez Nogueron6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesKengo Takishima vs Stanley Sou6-1, 6-4
L#4 SinglesMarco A Sandoval vs Joaquin Peralta2-6, 6-7
2026-02-02vs LLTC - Dad Bods (singles)Won 31
W#1 SinglesYouyou Lu vs Mark Etienne6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJoshua Minns vs Bach Nghiem7-5, 6-1
L#3 SinglesDavid Kolacny vs Matthew McKillip3-6, 6-7
W#4 SinglesMarco A Sandoval vs Nathan Daniels7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5  Men's Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Antonio Bucarizza
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.22
Joshua Minns
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
4.21
Youyou Lu
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.15
David Kolacny
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.12
Mitchell Kreider
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.00
Kengo Takishima
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.73
Marco A Sandoval
usually #4 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Antonio Bucarizza
30W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
Joshua Minns
50W–26L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.22
Youyou Lu
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
David Kolacny
17W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
4.15
Mitchell Kreider
44W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
4.12
Kengo Takishima
30W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
Marco A Sandoval
36W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.