Teams

LLTC - Dad Bods (singles)

2026 HTA Spring NA - Men's Singles Monday · 4.5  Men's Singles

12 players · average NTRP 4.20 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-23vs MPTC - Good GuysSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJames Bui vs Diego Martinez Nogueron6-2, 6-3
L#2 SinglesLening Wang vs Jose Garcia3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-16vs HFTC - Thunder ThrashersWon 21
L#1 SinglesRichard Yang vs Tipton McMahon3-6
W#2 SinglesMatthew McKillip vs Nazario Denova6-3, 6-4
W#4 SinglesMark Etienne vs Stephen Brown6-3, 6-3
2026-03-02vs HFTC - VenomWon 21
W#2 SinglesMark Etienne vs Jeff Brisbois6-4, 6-2
W#3 SinglesDillon Piper vs Van Truong6-3, 6-3
L#4 SinglesHendrick Suwirjo vs Kenneth Williams3-6, 1-6
2026-02-23vs LLTC - Quick SilverWon 31
W#1 SinglesJames Bui vs HAI DONG NGUYEN6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRichard Yang vs Victor Lee6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesLening Wang vs Ronald Domantay6-1, 6-3
L#4 SinglesMark Etienne vs Javier Bustos4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2026-02-09vs HFTC - ZealotsSplit 11
W#1 SinglesJames Bui vs Alex Bianca7-6, 6-4
L#3 SinglesNathan Daniels vs Joel Henry1-6, 2-6
2026-02-02vs MPTC - WolverineLost 13
L#1 SinglesMark Etienne vs Youyou Lu1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesBach Nghiem vs Joshua Minns5-7, 1-6
W#3 SinglesMatthew McKillip vs David Kolacny6-3, 7-6
L#4 SinglesNathan Daniels vs Marco A Sandoval5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.5  Men's Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LLTC - Dad Bods (singles)06141020189

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
James Bui
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.32
Brett Soderdahl
published 4.5
4.22
Richard Yang
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
4.21
Nathan Daniels
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.16
Matthew McKillip
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.10
Lening Wang
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
4.03
Bach Nghiem
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Mark Etienne
usually #4 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.83
Hendrick Suwirjo
usually #4 Singles 100% · published 4
3.78
Dillon Piper
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
Jason Ye
published
Justin Chang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brett Soderdahl + Lening Wang4160% games+7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
James Bui
96W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4.5
Brett Soderdahl
30W–14L career · no lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
Richard Yang
17W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.22
Nathan Daniels
36W–37L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
4.21
Matthew McKillip
72W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
4.16
Lening Wang
80W–38L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
4.10
4
Bach Nghiem
46W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%41%59%
4.03
Mark Etienne
48W–31L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Hendrick Suwirjo
37W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Dillon Piper
13W–21L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.78
Jason Ye
3W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Justin Chang
19W–15L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.