Teams

GILROY TENNIS CLUB/GILROY TENNIS CTR 40MX7.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Matthew Wagoner
published
3.58
Anthony Bontempi
published 4
3.45
Malvin Mercado
published
3.40
Samantha Zhang
published
3.40
Dan Liang
published 3.5
3.32
Robert Nettleblad
published
3.29
John Machmiller
published
Carol Marques
published 3.5
3.22
Amir Ahmadzadeh
published 3.5
3.20
Michael Jones
published
3.19
Kristie Solomon
published
3.16
Theresa Braen
published
3.15
Dana Padilla
published 3.5
3.15
Robert Watts
published
3.13
Aida Cazares
published 3.5
3.11
Jewel A Knofler
published
3.01
Bret Hammon
published 3.5
2.99
Laura Schenkelberg
published
2.97
Tina Tillotson
published
2.91
Elaine Kwok
published
Mark McAndrews
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Liang + Samantha Zhang8750% games−11.6% vs expected
Theresa Braen + Robert Nettleblad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Wagoner
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Anthony Bontempi
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Malvin Mercado
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Samantha Zhang
23W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Dan Liang
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Robert Nettleblad
7W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
John Machmiller
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Carol Marques
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Amir Ahmadzadeh
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Michael Jones
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Kristie Solomon
29W–19L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
Theresa Braen
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Dana Padilla
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Robert Watts
4W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Aida Cazares
8W–16L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Jewel A Knofler
22W–26L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Bret Hammon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
Laura Schenkelberg
23W–33L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Tina Tillotson
3W–13L career · no lines in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.97
Elaine Kwok
16W–16L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Mark McAndrews
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.