Teams

PIPER PK 18AW3.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-31vs MILL VALLEY 18AW3.0BWon 50
W#1 DoublesAlison Bricker / Molly Weitzberg vs Kara Johnson / Ingrid Tolson6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLiana Buttles vs Julia Rimas6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKelly Dwinells / Andrea Millstein vs Tuyen Bonneau / Anna Hindley6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesTricia Ghalam vs Anna Hughes6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoanna Dachs / Yolande Heller vs Eliot Donahue / Kate Shaw6-4, 6-3
2025-04-27vs MILL VALLEY 18AW3.0BWon 32
W#1 DoublesCori Ladd / Molly Weitzberg vs Lauren Ryan / Donna Rogers6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesLiana Buttles vs Julia Rimas6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Dwinells / Andrea Millstein vs Tuyen Bonneau / Kara Johnson5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTricia Ghalam vs Beth Safrit6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoanna Dachs / Tabatha Kallman vs Kelsey Cahill / Eliot Donahue6-3, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Tricia Ghalam
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Liana Buttles
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.97
Alison Bricker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Yolande Heller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Tabatha Kallman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Andrea Millstein
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Kelly Dwinells
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Joanna Dachs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Joanne Hernon
published
Ann Rose Boas
published 3
2.68
Cori Ladd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kelli Fleitas
published
Molly Weitzberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tabatha Kallman + Andrea Millstein8269% games+4.6% vs expected
Yolande Heller + Liana Buttles404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tricia Ghalam
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Liana Buttles
12W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Alison Bricker
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Yolande Heller
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Tabatha Kallman
13W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Andrea Millstein
16W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Kelly Dwinells
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Joanna Dachs
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Joanne Hernon
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Ann Rose Boas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cori Ladd
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Kelli Fleitas
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
2.56
Molly Weitzberg
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.