Teams

MILL VALLEY 18AW3.0B

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.0

21 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-11vs MARIN CC 18AW3.0ALost 23
L#1 DoublesKate Shaw / Lauren Ryan vs Thalia Milano / Despina Mancini0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesWhitney Lynch vs Angelica Kirsten6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKim McFerrin / Eliot Donahue vs Allie Etchebehere / Shannon Kruger1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesBeth Safrit vs Haley Dougherty2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValerie Montague / Shoshanna Moglen vs Debra Bernier / Wendy Buscaglia6-4, 6-2
2025-05-31vs PIPER PK 18AW3.0ALost 05
L#1 DoublesKara Johnson / Ingrid Tolson vs Alison Bricker / Molly Weitzberg1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Rimas vs Liana Buttles2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTuyen Bonneau / Anna Hindley vs Kelly Dwinells / Andrea Millstein3-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesAnna Hughes vs Tricia Ghalam3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEliot Donahue / Kate Shaw vs Joanna Dachs / Yolande Heller4-6, 3-6
2025-05-10vs MARIN CC 18AW3.0AWon 32
L#1 DoublesTuyen Bonneau / Kara Johnson vs Shannon Kruger / Despina Mancini2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBeth Safrit vs Brooke Palizi6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMeghan Ellis / Kate Shaw vs Wendy Buscaglia / Molly Knapp6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesEliot Donahue vs Christina Peppers6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSabrina Dumas / Kimberly Knopf vs Catherine Cafaro / Marguerite Coin6-4, 6-2
2025-04-27vs PIPER PK 18AW3.0ALost 23
L#1 DoublesLauren Ryan / Donna Rogers vs Cori Ladd / Molly Weitzberg1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJulia Rimas vs Liana Buttles3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTuyen Bonneau / Kara Johnson vs Kelly Dwinells / Andrea Millstein7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBeth Safrit vs Tricia Ghalam3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKelsey Cahill / Eliot Donahue vs Joanna Dachs / Tabatha Kallman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Whitney Lynch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Gisella MacKay
published 3
3.02
Eliot Donahue
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Meghan Ellis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Tuyen Bonneau
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Beth Safrit
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.81
Valerie Montague
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Hess
published 3
2.74
Julia Rimas
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.72
Donna Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Kate Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.65
Shoshanna Moglen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Anna Hindley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Sabrina Dumas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Kara Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Ingrid Tolson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Anna Hughes
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Lauren Ryan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.45
Kim McFerrin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelsey Cahill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Knopf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anna Hindley + Tuyen Bonneau123 matchesnot enough data
Shoshanna Moglen + Lauren Ryan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Whitney Lynch
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3
Gisella MacKay
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Eliot Donahue
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
Meghan Ellis
5W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
Tuyen Bonneau
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Beth Safrit
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
2.85
Valerie Montague
4W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
92%8%<1%
2.81
3
Alex Hess
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julia Rimas
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Donna Rogers
5W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Kate Shaw
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
2.65
Shoshanna Moglen
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Anna Hindley
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%<1%
2.63
Sabrina Dumas
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.62
Kara Johnson
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Ingrid Tolson
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
24%75%<1%
2.59
3
Anna Hughes
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lauren Ryan
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
Kim McFerrin
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
Kelsey Cahill
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Knopf
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.