Teams

IRMSL/Spahr/55&Over7.0W

2024 IRMSL Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women Sat

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesCynthia Croom / Tara Ramsey vs Leslie London / JoAnn Merklinghaus3-6, 4-6
2024-04-06vs NRS - GlasrudWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Spahr / Cynthia Croom vs Lynn Pittinos / Carol Kushner6-2, 6-4
W#1 DoublesMichele Packard / Cynthia Croom vs Pia Gold / Debbie Caldwell6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women Sat have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Melissa Dean
published
3.33
Cynthia Croom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Catherine Spahr
published 3.5
Carol Emmons Finch
published 3.5
Danette Bray
published 3.5
3.18
Nancy Barry
published
3.17
Patty Grady
published
3.00
Janel Griffin
published
2.87
Diane Mello
published 3.5
Lynne Norman
published
Michele Packard
published
Sue Anderson
published
Sue Davis
published
Tara Ramsey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Barry + Melissa Dean5067% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Cynthia Croom
54W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Catherine Spahr
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Carol Emmons Finch
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Danette Bray
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nancy Barry
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Patty Grady
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Janel Griffin
11W–18L career · no lines in 2024
50%50%<1%
3.00
3.5
Diane Mello
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
Lynne Norman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Packard
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Anderson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sue Davis
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tara Ramsey
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.