Teams

RHCC GREEN

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs MVCC GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Beth Trammell vs Tara McEnroe / Beth Eiseman4-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesBryn Marsh vs Stephanie Whitman6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKari Eckert / Tiffany Skiles vs Margaret Keslosky / Jane Reimer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCarol Tye Rose / Nicolle McKinney vs Christyn Benzle / Debra O'Donnell6-4, 6-2
2024-07-08vs MC BLUESplit 22
L#1 DoublesJoelle Delisa / Kari Eckert vs Becky Lowery / Jennifer Clegg6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCheryl Crawford vs Jennifer Arnold2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Nicolle McKinney vs Annmarie Oien / Jackie Greiner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBeth Trammell / Carol Tye Rose vs Betty Evans / Amanda Mayock7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-01vs LPTC NAVYWon 31
W#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Cheryl Crawford vs Kay Newman / Claudia Perales6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBryn Marsh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTiffany Skiles / Joelle Delisa vs Meegan Miloud / Jody Barbour4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicolle McKinney / Carol Tye Rose vs Leigh Goerke / Kelly Wilson2-6, 4-6
2024-06-24vs NJ YELLOWSplit 22
W#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Bryn Marsh vs Barb Redford / Melanie Abel6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesCheryl Crawford vs Karen Stanley6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Beth Trammell vs Norma Crockett / Dawn Cartier1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesNicolle McKinney / Tiffany Skiles vs Laura Freeman / Katrina Sachs4-6, 1-6
2024-06-17vs NJ TEALLost 13
L#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Kari Eckert vs Mollie Toth / Tara Hammar1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBryn Marsh vs Barbara Westfall6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Crawford / Beth Trammell vs Sara Leaver / Denise Champion2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNicolle McKinney / Carol Tye Rose vs Bonita Thistle / Katie Keighley3-6, 0-6
2024-06-10vs MVCC GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesKari Eckert / Bryn Marsh vs Tara McEnroe / Nadine Witte2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTiffany Skiles / Cheryl Crawford vs Stephanie Whitman / Kim Hassinger1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Trammell / Nicolle McKinney vs Debra O'Donnell / Beth Eiseman2-6, 3-6
2024-06-03vs MC BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerri Whitehair / Bryn Marsh vs Annmarie Oien / Kathleen Connell6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTiffany Skiles / Joelle Delisa vs Jackie Greiner / Amanda Mayock7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKari Eckert / Carol Tye Rose vs Kirsten Sharer / Betty Evans6-4, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Bryn Marsh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Terri Whitehair
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.85
Joelle Delisa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Beth Trammell
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Cheryl Crawford
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Carol Tye Rose
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Tiffany Skiles
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.58
Kari Eckert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Jill Haug
published
Nicolle McKinney
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joelle Delisa + Kari Eckert3350% games+9.8% vs expected
Joelle Delisa + Tiffany Skiles111052% games+4.6% vs expected
Terri Whitehair + Beth Trammell101447% games+4.1% vs expected
Nicolle McKinney + Beth Trammell2344% games+1.6% vs expected
Kari Eckert + Tiffany Skiles1535% games−5.1% vs expected
Carol Tye Rose + Nicolle McKinney1439% gamesnot enough data
Carol Tye Rose + Kari Eckert314 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Crawford + Beth Trammell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bryn Marsh
47W–12L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Terri Whitehair
58W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Joelle Delisa
26W–23L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Beth Trammell
23W–29L career · 5 lines in 2024
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Cheryl Crawford
39W–50L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Carol Tye Rose
31W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
Tiffany Skiles
31W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Kari Eckert
64W–87L career · 6 lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
2.58
Jill Haug
18W–17L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicolle McKinney
26W–36L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.