LPTC NAVY
2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER
9 players · average NTRP 2.94 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule7 played
i
Flight standings40 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BCC BLUE | 6 | 1 | 18 | 200 |
| 2RRTC NAVY | 6 | 1 | 21 | 221 |
| 3MVCC NAVY | 6 | 1 | 21 | 229 |
| 4GNO GREEN | 6 | 1 | 23 | 220 |
| 5CCC PURPLE | 6 | 1 | 24 | 212 |
| 6DTP TEAL | 5 | 2 | 24 | 212 |
| 7MVCC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 26 | 237 |
| 8GTC BLUE | 5 | 2 | 26 | 244 |
| 9GCC NAVY | 5 | 2 | 26 | 225 |
| 10GR NAVY | 5 | 2 | 34 | 265 |
| 11CVTA GREEN | 4 | 2 | 22 | 164 |
| 12RRTC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 22 | 198 |
| 13CVTA TEAL | 4 | 3 | 25 | 187 |
| 14PRKR GREEN | 4 | 3 | 26 | 233 |
| 15RCC RED | 4 | 3 | 29 | 225 |
| 16BCC RED | 4 | 3 | 31 | 221 |
| 17HG TEAL | 4 | 3 | 31 | 244 |
| 18BM GREEN | 4 | 3 | 36 | 272 |
| 19PH BLUE | 3 | 4 | 29 | 241 |
| 20HV BLUE | 3 | 4 | 30 | 244 |
| 21HG GREEN | 3 | 4 | 30 | 249 |
| 22PRKR NAVY | 3 | 4 | 32 | 256 |
| 23SS-H YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 32 | 245 |
| 24MC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 34 | 250 |
| 25RHCC GREEN | 3 | 4 | 35 | 259 |
| 26GR GREEN | 3 | 4 | 37 | 269 |
| 27BCC GREEN | 2 | 4 | 32 | 225 |
| 28LAC GREEN | 2 | 4 | 32 | 226 |
| 29RMTC RED | 2 | 4 | 32 | 230 |
| 30CCC RED | 2 | 5 | 34 | 261 |
| 31LPTC NAVY | 2 | 5 | 37 | 255 |
| 32CK BLUE | 2 | 5 | 40 | 270 |
| 33CM ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 41 | 280 |
| 34HIW GREEN | 1 | 5 | 37 | 267 |
| 35NJ PURPLE | 1 | 6 | 39 | 266 |
| 36VC BLUE | 1 | 6 | 40 | 290 |
| 37FOX RED | 1 | 6 | 41 | 281 |
| 38CR-B GREEN | 1 | 6 | 44 | 276 |
| 39WP-G RED | 1 | 6 | 46 | 297 |
| 40LTC-D GREEN | 0 | 6 | 42 | 269 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Tina Atchley + Rebecca BaanHofman | 59–31 | 57% games | +3.0% vs expected |
| Laurie Lahnert + Rebecca BaanHofman | 3–4 | 50% games | −2.7% vs expected |
| Laurie Lahnert + Meegan Miloud | 4–3 | 51% games | −3.1% vs expected |
| Kay Newman + Meegan Miloud | 11–12 | 48% games | −7.2% vs expected |
| Kay Newman + Rebecca BaanHofman | 4–1 | 62% games | not enough data |
| Leigh Goerke + Meegan Miloud | 3–1 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Jody Barbour + Meegan Miloud | 0–3 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.