Teams

BC-PVTC/GalenaMiller-Hori

2021 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-08-08vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJudy Purne / Jacqueline Geiger vs Jordan Shapiro / Erin Fiorito0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesStephanie Guggenheim vs Mika Kaiser6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2021-08-01Won 20
W#1 DoublesRandi Young / Irene Pailet vs Cheryl Williams / Lisa Avila6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesStephanie Guggenheim vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-07-25vs BC-AltaVista/LynetteCampbellWon 20
W#1 SinglesStephanie Guggenheim vs Angelica Galvez-Deutsch6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJudy Purne / Sophie Sokolow vs Sanghee Kim / Riho Nakano6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2021-07-18vs BC-MCC/AnneGummWon 20
W#1 DoublesIrene Pailet / Randi Young vs Christine Bucklin / Christa Givich6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesVenita McLay / Judy Purne vs Anne Gumm / Rachel Alexander3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-07-11vs BC-MCC/JulieWattsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJudy Purne / Eiko Bacich vs Heidi Weber / Leasa Ireland6-3, 6-4
2021-07-03vs BC-LLW-AltaVista/MaryRoseKalemLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Geiger / Randi Young vs Rita Benson / Alison Latiolait2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarol Flick / Judy Purne vs Tracy Costantino / Xiaozhen Yuan6-7, 1-6
2021-06-27vs BC-WestEnd/CherylUnreinWon 10
W#2 DoublesEiko Bacich / Judy Purne vs Lauran Jacks / Jennifer Siegal7-6, 0-6, 1-0
2021-06-13vs BC-MCC/AnneGummWon 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Guggenheim / Irene Pailet vs Marci Beech / Rona Martins6-3, 6-1
2021-06-06vs BC-MCC/JulieWattsLost 01
L#1 DoublesMay Feuer / Sophie Sokolow vs Kris Rone / Bernice Lake1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Stephanie Guggenheim
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.84
3.50
Venita McLay
published
3.37
Judy Purne
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jacqueline Geiger
published
May Feuer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Randi Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

May Feuer + Judy Purne044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Guggenheim
67W–59L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%84%15%
3.87
4
Galena Miller-Horii
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.84
Venita McLay
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.50
Judy Purne
25W–55L career · 6 lines in 2021
84%16%<1%
3.37
Jacqueline Geiger
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
May Feuer
9W–14L career · 1 line in 2021
not enough data
Randi Young
46W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.