Teams

TTA BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.22 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs BRMST REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Rossi Javernick vs Susan Moore / Sarah Post6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Cheryl Williams6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLynn Hayes / Sherry Cree vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Kari Diamond3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Zolfi / Linda Hendrix vs Carol Anderson / Ann Ipsen1-6, 0-6
2022-07-14vs LTA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Catherine Jankowski vs Claire Schlosser / Mai Vu6-4, 1-3
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Melissa Karch6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Cook / Lindsay Madden vs Jodie Morgan / Stephanie Short4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCasey Ahn-O'Connor / Linda Hendrix vs Leslie Jackson / Tracy King4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-07vs CVTA GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Casey Ahn-O'Connor vs Linda Schutter / Jackye Whalen6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLindsay Madden / Janice Cook vs Denise McSheehy / Kathryn Wagner-Ehlmann6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSherry Cree / Linda Hendrix vs Denise Boselli / Dawna Eastman-Gallo6-2, 7-5
2022-06-30vs BTA REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Rossi Javernick vs Lindsey Killion / Lindsay Sutula2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLindsay Madden vs Wendy Scipione6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJanice Cook / Lynn Hayes vs Pat Burgener / Veronica Johnston3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Zolfi / Casey Ahn-O'Connor vs Tolley Sink / Laurie Rhoads7-5, 7-5
2022-06-23vs MEA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Lynn Hayes vs Sue Malek / Martha Lanaghen3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesSherry Cree vs Diane Bohan6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesCasey Ahn-O'Connor / Camilla Shumaker vs Susan Lewis / Jinfang Li6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Zolfi / Katie Brown vs Molly Kirk / Teri Jean Fry1-6, 1-6
2022-06-16vs LTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesLindsay Madden / Casey Ahn-O'Connor vs Anita Taylor / Stephanie Ohlsen6-1, 0-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMary Peonio vs Connie Mansour3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDeborah Zolfi / Katie Brown vs Rebekah Harvey / Carly Mayer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCatherine Jankowski / Rossi Javernick vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-09vs CVTA REDSplit 22
W#1 DoublesRossi Javernick / Catherine Jankowski vs Marion Fisher / Natalia Harms3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLindsay Madden vs Meghan Estrada3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Cook / Katie Brown vs Heather Riley / Laurie Harris3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCamilla Shumaker / Linda Hendrix vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Casey Ahn-O'Connor
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.44
Mary Peonio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Rossi Javernick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Lindsay Madden
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Lynn Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Sherry Cree
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Catherine Jankowski
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.81
Janice Cook
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Deborah Zolfi
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Linda Hendrix
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Camilla Shumaker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rossi Javernick + Casey Ahn-O'Connor5071% games+9.2% vs expected
Catherine Jankowski + Rossi Javernick13756% games+5.7% vs expected
Janice Cook + Casey Ahn-O'Connor4156% games+4.5% vs expected
Janice Cook + Lynn Hayes5949% games+4.0% vs expected
Janice Cook + Lindsay Madden11652% games+3.7% vs expected
Janice Cook + Linda Hendrix1441% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Jankowski + Linda Hendrix134 matchesnot enough data
Janice Cook + Sherry Cree123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Casey Ahn-O'Connor
46W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
Mary Peonio
52W–29L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Rossi Javernick
77W–40L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Lindsay Madden
62W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Lynn Hayes
11W–19L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Sherry Cree
62W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3
Catherine Jankowski
53W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Janice Cook
69W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Deborah Zolfi
18W–33L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
2.5
Linda Hendrix
17W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Camilla Shumaker
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.