Teams

CVTA RED

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs LTA NAVYSplit 22
L#1 DoublesTerry Tessier / Natalia Harms vs Jodie Morgan / Claire Schlosser1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Estrada vs Mai Vu7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Keri Konold vs Lori Preston / Leslie Jackson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeidi Johnson / Cammie Weiss vs Melissa Karch / Tracy King0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-14vs CVTA GREENWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeidi Johnson / Cammie Weiss vs Denise Boselli / Lori Segeth6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKeri Konold vs Kathryn Wagner-Ehlmann6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesNatalia Harms / Heather Riley vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesTerry Tessier / Michaela Masciarelli vs Amy Butler / Mary Buchanan7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-07-07vs BTA REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesKeri Konold / Michelle Beard vs Lindsay Sutula / Lindsey Killion3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMeghan Estrada vs Kristi Gray6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Tolley Sink / Stephanie Watson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLaurie Harris / Heidi Johnson vs Ruth Henderson / Wendy Scipione6-4, 7-6
2022-06-30vs MEA GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesCammie Weiss / Heidi Johnson vs Martha Lanaghen / Sue Malek6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Kerry Hanneman vs Teri Jean Fry / Molly Kirk4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaurie Harris / Meghan Estrada vs Paula King / Susan Lewis6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-23vs LTA GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesNatalia Harms / Michelle Beard vs Christina Finkel / Adele Reester4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeri Konold vs Connie Mansour4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Meghan Estrada vs Stephanie Ohlsen / Karen Dauer4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMichaela Masciarelli / Laurie Harris vs Rebekah Harvey / Linda Ducay6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-16vs BRMST REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesHeidi Johnson / Cammie Weiss vs Cheryl Williams / Sarah Post4-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesKeri Konold vs Susan Moore6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTerry Tessier / Natalia Harms vs Cynthia Manley / Carol Anderson1-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLaurie Harris / Kerry Hanneman vs Lynn Knickerbocker / Kari Diamond1-6, 2-6
2022-06-09vs TTA BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarion Fisher / Natalia Harms vs Rossi Javernick / Catherine Jankowski6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMeghan Estrada vs Lindsay Madden6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Riley / Laurie Harris vs Janice Cook / Katie Brown6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Natalia Harms
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.94
Marion Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Kerry Hanneman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Michaela Masciarelli
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.67
Terry Tessier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Cammie Weiss
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Keri Konold
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Laurie Harris
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Meghan Estrada
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Beard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kerry Hanneman + Michaela Masciarelli111450% games+0.0% vs expected
Terry Tessier + Michaela Masciarelli2841% games−3.1% vs expected
Kerry Hanneman + Terry Tessier1444% games−5.1% vs expected
Michelle Beard + Michaela Masciarelli0534% games−12.7% vs expected
Michelle Beard + Keri Konold3252% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Estrada + Terry Tessier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Natalia Harms
50W–25L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Marion Fisher
16W–26L career · 1 line in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.94
Kerry Hanneman
27W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
2.78
3
Michaela Masciarelli
31W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
3
Terry Tessier
76W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Cammie Weiss
3W–10L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Keri Konold
19W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laurie Harris
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Meghan Estrada
20W–17L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michelle Beard
19W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.