Teams

CTL55/Szwec/WRC

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-12vs CTL55/Newman/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRob Szwec / Michael Beall vs Scott Newman / Robert French3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Boland / Jim Bigham vs Douglas Deaderick / Michael Hall2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-09vs CTL55/Brooks/GVWon 21
W#1 DoublesRob Szwec / Michael Beall vs Reginald Cooper / Berry Bullock6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoseph Boland / Jim Bigham vs James Clark / Gerald Simpson6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEric Feuerstein / John Mason vs Michael Brooks / Leon Freeman6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Bailey)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRob Szwec / Daniel Goolsby vs Joseph Bernard / Stephen Anderson7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Powell / Jim Bigham vs Norman Bailey / Michael Sandlin7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-19vs CTL55/Newman/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesEric Feuerstein / Jim Bigham vs Scott Newman / Marshall Moore1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRob Szwec / Jim Powell vs Robert French / Glenn White5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDaniel Goolsby / Michael Beall vs Don Cope / Shay Martin7-5, 6-4
2026-03-08vs CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Bailey)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Beall / Daniel Goolsby vs Norman Bailey / John Robinson7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJim Bigham / Eric Feuerstein vs Stephen Anderson / Johnny Burg2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJim Powell / Rob Szwec vs Tim Belshaw / GYLES GREGORY3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-01vs CTL55/Brooks/GVWon 20
W#1 DoublesDaniel Goolsby / Michael Beall vs Michael Brooks / William James6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJoseph Boland / Jim Bigham vs James Clark / Gerald Simpson6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-22vs CTL55/Newman/CTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesDaniel Goolsby / Michael Beall vs Robert French / Marshall Moore7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRob Szwec / Jim Powell vs Douglas Deaderick / Timothy Hewson4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoseph Boland / Jim Bigham vs Scott Newman / Shay Martin6-2, 6-3
2026-02-15vs CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Bailey)Split 11
W#1 DoublesDaniel Goolsby / Michael Beall vs Rob Holleman / Tim Belshaw6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRob Szwec / Joseph Boland vs Stephen Anderson / Joseph Bernard6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-08vs CTL55/Brooks/GVWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael James / Rob Szwec vs Berry Bullock / Reginald Cooper2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Goolsby / Michael Beall vs Michael Brooks / Leon Freeman6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJim Bigham / Eric Feuerstein vs James Clark / William James6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Daniel Goolsby
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.75
Michael Beall
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
3.68
Eric Feuerstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Rob Szwec
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.60
Joseph Boland
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.46
Jim Bigham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.81
John Mason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jim Powell
published
Michael James
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniel Goolsby + Michael Beall8164% games+8.2% vs expected
Joseph Boland + Jim Bigham141848% games−1.1% vs expected
Michael James + Jim Powell5447% games−4.3% vs expected
Rob Szwec + Jim Powell224 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Boland + Rob Szwec033 matchesnot enough data
Rob Szwec + Michael James213 matchesnot enough data
Eric Feuerstein + Jim Bigham123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Daniel Goolsby
39W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Michael Beall
33W–39L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Eric Feuerstein
57W–38L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.68
Rob Szwec
61W–58L career · 8 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Joseph Boland
51W–68L career · 5 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
Jim Bigham
91W–84L career · 8 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.46
John Mason
17W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.81
Jim Powell
57W–48L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael James
25W–23L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.