Teams

CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Bailey)

Adult 55 & Over - USTA · 55 & Over Adult Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-04-12vs CTL55/Brooks/GVWon 21
L#1 DoublesTim Belshaw / Joseph Bernard vs Berry Bullock / Reginald Cooper2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGYLES GREGORY / Michael Sandlin vs Michael Brooks / Leon Freeman2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNorman Bailey / John Robinson vs Gerald Simpson / James Clark7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2026-03-29vs CTL55/Szwec/WRCWon 20
W#1 DoublesJoseph Bernard / Stephen Anderson vs Rob Szwec / Daniel Goolsby6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNorman Bailey / Michael Sandlin vs Jim Powell / Jim Bigham6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-22vs CTL55/Newman/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesNorman Bailey / Michael Sandlin vs Robert French / Marshall Moore5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Anderson / Johnny Burg vs Scott Newman / Rolf Kiser7-6, 2-2
W#3 DoublesSteven Austermiller / GYLES GREGORY vs Glenn White / Michael Hall6-3, 6-0
2026-03-15vs CTL55/Brooks/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohnny Burg / Stephen Anderson vs Michael Brooks / Leon Freeman5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJohn Robinson / Joseph Bernard vs James Clark / William James6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteven Austermiller / GYLES GREGORY vs Reginald Cooper / Berry Bullock3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-08vs CTL55/Szwec/WRCWon 21
W#1 DoublesNorman Bailey / John Robinson vs Michael Beall / Daniel Goolsby6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStephen Anderson / Johnny Burg vs Jim Bigham / Eric Feuerstein2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTim Belshaw / GYLES GREGORY vs Jim Powell / Rob Szwec3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-01vs CTL55/Newman/CTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Bernard / Rob Holleman vs Marshall Moore / Robert French4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohnny Burg / Stephen Anderson vs Shay Martin / Don Cope3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTim Belshaw / GYLES GREGORY vs Rolf Kiser / Mark Gardiner7-6, 7-6
2026-02-22vs CTL55/Brooks/GVLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoseph Bernard / John Robinson vs James Clark / Gerald Simpson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSteven Austermiller / Norman Bailey vs Michael Brooks / Leon Freeman6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesGYLES GREGORY / Michael Sandlin vs Berry Bullock / Reginald Cooper4-6, 2-6
2026-02-15vs CTL55/Szwec/WRCWon 21
L#1 DoublesRob Holleman / Tim Belshaw vs Daniel Goolsby / Michael Beall1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Anderson / Joseph Bernard vs Rob Szwec / Joseph Boland6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNorman Bailey / Steven Austermiller vs Michael James / Jim Powell4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-08vs CTL55/Newman/CTCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSteven Austermiller / Norman Bailey vs Robert French / Marshall Moore4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGYLES GREGORY / Michael Sandlin vs Mark Gardiner / Glenn White4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 55 & Over Adult Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CTL (A) 4.0M 55 & Over (Bailey)54151234255
2CTL55/Brooks/GV45131433244

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Steven Austermiller
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.68
Norman Bailey
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.60
GYLES GREGORY
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.59
Joseph Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Johnny Burg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.48
Tim Belshaw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Sandlin
published
Rob Holleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stephen Anderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

GYLES GREGORY + Stephen Anderson4946% games−3.6% vs expected
Steven Austermiller + Norman Bailey7257% gamesnot enough data
Michael Sandlin + Johnny Burg1648% gamesnot enough data
Michael Sandlin + Steven Austermiller314 matchesnot enough data
Michael Sandlin + Tim Belshaw213 matchesnot enough data
Rob Holleman + Steven Austermiller213 matchesnot enough data
Norman Bailey + Tim Belshaw123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Steven Austermiller
18W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Norman Bailey
17W–15L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
GYLES GREGORY
50W–72L career · 11 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Joseph Bernard
102W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
Johnny Burg
21W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Tim Belshaw
5W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
Michael Sandlin
22W–30L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Rob Holleman
30W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephen Anderson
57W–53L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.