Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings9 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Arreola/40&over/3.0W71301025266
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)71281231288
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(DaCosta)(EPTC#1)53231738325
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)53192146339
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Boss)(EPTC#2)35211945369
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC)35172348348
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)26152554399
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)26132758392
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)26122858377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Alyssa Hinojos
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #1 Singles 18% · published 3.5
2.63
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
usually #2 Doubles 53%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.52
Cecilia Marquez
usually #1 Singles 48%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.44
Eufemia Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.38
Esther McCarthy
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published 2.5
Leticia Augsberger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published
Loretta Pineda
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
Maria Parra
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Sara Blanco
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published
Sharon Ransom
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Vera Ray
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Veronica Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Ransom + Esther McCarthy5256% games+5.0% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Sharon Ransom161252% games+3.3% vs expected
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker + Sharon Ransom5355% games+2.8% vs expected
Vera Ray + Sharon Ransom91344% games+2.5% vs expected
Esther McCarthy + Veronica Gonzalez10456% games+1.7% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Esther McCarthy6945% games−0.5% vs expected
Leticia Augsberger + Esther McCarthy6845% games−11.0% vs expected
Eufemia Garcia + Cecilia Marquez7456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alyssa Hinojos
42W–44L career · 16 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker
59W–86L career · 15 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Cecilia Marquez
66W–57L career · 21 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.52
3
Eufemia Garcia
81W–124L career · type A · 27 lines in 2024
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Esther McCarthy
75W–87L career · 16 lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.38
Leticia Augsberger
26W–59L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Loretta Pineda
13W–12L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Parra
1W–12L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Blanco
48W–72L career · 28 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sharon Ransom
66W–105L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vera Ray
31W–64L career · 14 lines in 2024
not enough data
Veronica Gonzalez
50W–71L career · 19 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.