Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

16 players · average NTRP 2.88 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesClaudia Dominguez / Bianca Martinez vs Guadalupe Ivonne Soto / Rebecca Vega Renteria6-2, 6-0
2024-04-20Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Dominguez / Bianca Martinez vs Flor Alvarado / Roma Fonseca6-7, 3-6
2023-11-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesClaudia Dominguez / Beverly Best vs Renee Aguilar / Alexa Dunlop4-6, 4-6
2023-11-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeverly Best / Tanja Sobing vs Jessie Lindsay / Kristen Swanson-Pallares4-6, 6-7
2023-10-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJassivy Hernandez / Beverly Best vs Patricia Moye Holderman / Lori Armendariz1-6, 3-6
2023-09-23Lost 02
L#2 DoublesClaudia Dominguez / Bianca Martinez vs Anita Boss / Lourdes Olivas1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBeverly Best / Clarissa Martinez vs Celia Al-Tahan / Yzahiti Angulo7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2023-09-16Won 10
W#2 DoublesBeverly Best / Yazmin Pineda vs Cristal Tirado / Sabrina Monroy1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-09-09Split 11
W#1 DoublesBianca Martinez / Claudia Dominguez vs Sharon Ransom / Rachel Munoz6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesBeverly Best / Alison Krattiger vs Vera Ray / Gerrianne Lockhart-Walker4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GEPTA/Arreola/40&over/3.0W71301025266
2GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Baeza)(EPCC#2)71281231288
3GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(DaCosta)(EPTC#1)53231738325
4GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Jabor)(EPCC#1)53192146339
5GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Boss)(EPTC#2)35211945369
6GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Cardenas)(CCC)35172348348
7GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Alarcon)(TW)26152554399
8GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Lechuga)(FB)26132758392
9GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Garcia)(EPTC#3)26122858377

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Emily Adamczyk
usually #1 Singles 62%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
2.71
Claudia Dominguez
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published 3
2.68
Alison Krattiger
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.64
Beverly Best
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.48
Bianca Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.25
Clarissa Martinez
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 2.5
Barbara Maya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Delfina Lechuga
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Jassivy Hernandez
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Kara Hurd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Krista Dennis
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Melanie Velez
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sherrill Isenhower
usually #1 Doubles 37%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Tanja Sobing
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Victoria Torres
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Yazmin Pineda
usually #2 Doubles 37%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Dominguez + Beverly Best7749% games−0.8% vs expected
Yazmin Pineda + Jassivy Hernandez11559% gamesnot enough data
Tanja Sobing + Claudia Dominguez5749% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Dominguez + Bianca Martinez4551% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Dominguez + Clarissa Martinez5452% gamesnot enough data
Claudia Dominguez + Alison Krattiger3446% gamesnot enough data
Alison Krattiger + Krista Dennis1442% gamesnot enough data
Alison Krattiger + Beverly Best134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emily Adamczyk
9W–4L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Claudia Dominguez
60W–65L career · 19 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Alison Krattiger
29W–54L career · 20 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Beverly Best
13W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Bianca Martinez
4W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.48
2.5
Clarissa Martinez
15W–31L career · 19 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Barbara Maya
3W–22L career · 12 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Delfina Lechuga
14W–55L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jassivy Hernandez
55W–41L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kara Hurd
10W–26L career · 10 lines in 2024
not enough data
Krista Dennis
31W–27L career · 28 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Velez
6W–3L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherrill Isenhower
15W–4L career · 18 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanja Sobing
27W–37L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Torres
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yazmin Pineda
42W–36L career · 26 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.