Teams

Hester Lowe

2025 Combo Doubles 18&Over-NE · Women 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-07vs Burk/ DukeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Young / Hester Lowe vs Suzanne Cervantes / Loren Duke6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusanne Lindsey / Nena Lowe vs Arian Waldrop / Whitney Pegues-Beck6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesBriley Clement / Elise Mcmasters vs Danielle Burk / Ashley Gilliland6-1, 6-2
2025-09-29vs Burk/ DukeWon 30
W#1 DoublesElise Mcmasters / Nena Lowe vs Suzanne Cervantes / Kelly Gregory6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHester Lowe / Michelle Lindsey vs Alicia Green / Whitney Pegues-Beck3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusanne Lindsey / Amanda Sullivan vs Becca Heyer / Whitney McNutt6-1, 6-2
2025-09-15vs Burk/ DukeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Young / Elise Mcmasters vs Suzanne Cervantes / Angelia Thomas6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBriley Clement / Elizabeth Barnitz vs Anna Terrell Rea / Loren Duke6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Young / Hester Lowe vs Alicia Green / Whitney McNutt6-2, 6-2
2025-09-02vs Burk/ DukeWon 30
W#1 DoublesKelly Young / Elizabeth Barnitz vs Becca Heyer / Ashley Gilliland6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBriley Clement / Michelle Lindsey vs Arian Waldrop / Brooke McCafferty6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAnna Young / Hester Lowe vs Allie West / Angelia Thomas6-2, 6-0
2025-08-27vs Burk/ DukeWon 21
W#1 DoublesBriley Clement / Elise Mcmasters vs Allie West / Angelia Thomas7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSusanne Lindsey / Hester Lowe vs Arian Waldrop / Brooke McCafferty6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTracie Grammer / Genee Summers vs Danielle Burk / Whitney Pegues-Beck2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Kelly Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.51
Briley Clement
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.51
Susanne Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Anna Young
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Michelle Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Nena Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Hester Lowe
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.08
Elise Mcmasters
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.94
Elizabeth Barnitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Tracie Grammer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Genee Summers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly Young + Briley Clement6081% gamesnot enough data
Hester Lowe + Elise Mcmasters4164% gamesnot enough data
Elise Mcmasters + Briley Clement224 matchesnot enough data
Genee Summers + Elizabeth Barnitz213 matchesnot enough data
Susanne Lindsey + Michelle Lindsey303 matchesnot enough data
Anna Young + Hester Lowe303 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Lindsey + Briley Clement213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kelly Young
68W–7L career · 8 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Briley Clement
44W–21L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
Susanne Lindsey
53W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Anna Young
27W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
Michelle Lindsey
58W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
Nena Lowe
51W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
3.5
Hester Lowe
51W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.14
3.5
Elise Mcmasters
56W–39L career · 6 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Elizabeth Barnitz
43W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
Tracie Grammer
16W–41L career · 1 line in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.92
3
Genee Summers
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.