Teams

Cassanova/55/7.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-30vs Huffman/55/7.5/CM/POTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJohn Barr / Eugene Cassanova vs William Whitman / Dan Jones3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Lowe / Dwayne Slack vs Steve Hurst / Thomas O'Brien6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesTimothy Ellis / Todd Eppler vs Havard Yerger / Woodie Huffman2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-23vs Huffman/55/7.5/CM/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatric Dubois / Todd Eppler vs Norman Duhon / Thomas O'Brien1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Lowe / Robert Lettow vs Franklin Roemer / Ramin Zamani4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTimothy Ellis / Dwayne Slack vs Ted Takara / Woodie Huffman4-6, 3-6
2026-08-16vs Huffman/55/7.5/CM/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesTodd Eppler / Robert Lettow vs Norman Duhon / Dan Jones1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDavid Lowe / Eddie Holman vs Franklin Roemer / Anthony Spano2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Barr / Eugene Cassanova vs Jerry Davis / Woodie Huffman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Patric Dubois
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.56
John Barr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.53
Timothy Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Todd Eppler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Dwayne Slack
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Eddie Holman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
George Plaxco
published 3.5
3.03
Eugene Cassanova
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Robert Lettow
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Holman + Dwayne Slack7061% games+2.7% vs expected
Eugene Cassanova + Robert Lettow5260% gamesnot enough data
Robert Lettow + Eddie Holman314 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Ellis + Todd Eppler213 matchesnot enough data
Eugene Cassanova + Todd Eppler213 matchesnot enough data
George Plaxco + Eddie Holman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patric Dubois
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
John Barr
12W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Timothy Ellis
32W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
3.53
Todd Eppler
43W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
3.48
3.5
Dwayne Slack
36W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Eddie Holman
33W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
George Plaxco
6W–8L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
Eugene Cassanova
23W–26L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.03
Robert Lettow
21W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.