Teams

Huffman/55/7.5/CM/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 55 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-23vs Cassanova/55/7.5/CM/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNorman Duhon / Thomas O'Brien vs Patric Dubois / Todd Eppler1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesFranklin Roemer / Ramin Zamani vs David Lowe / Robert Lettow6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTed Takara / Woodie Huffman vs Timothy Ellis / Dwayne Slack6-4, 6-3
2026-08-16vs Cassanova/55/7.5/CM/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesNorman Duhon / Dan Jones vs Todd Eppler / Robert Lettow6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesFranklin Roemer / Anthony Spano vs David Lowe / Eddie Holman6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJerry Davis / Woodie Huffman vs John Barr / Eugene Cassanova6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Franklin Roemer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Norman Duhon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
William Whitman
published
3.60
Havard Yerger
published
3.60
Steve Hurst
published
3.51
Jerry Davis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Thomas O'Brien
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Woodie Huffman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Anthony Spano
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Ramin Zamani
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Peter Baltz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Baltz + Thomas O'Brien1546% games+0.5% vs expected
Peter Baltz + Woodie Huffman0627% games−14.4% vs expected
Franklin Roemer + Woodie Huffman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Franklin Roemer
16W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Norman Duhon
19W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
William Whitman
14W–13L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.67
Havard Yerger
6W–6L career · no lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Steve Hurst
18W–10L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Jerry Davis
15W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Thomas O'Brien
23W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Woodie Huffman
8W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Anthony Spano
3W–8L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.12
Ramin Zamani
8W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Peter Baltz
3W–19L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.06

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.