Teams

Redding 55s 3.0

2022 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-03-24vs GORHAM 55s 3.0Won 10
W#3 DoublesRose Chrismon / Myra Propst vs Melanie Smith / Janet Gorham7-5, 6-1
2022-03-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesLydia Nadel / Myra Propst vs Luisa Duran / Kay Kinnear6-1, 6-0
2022-03-10vs Shivaji/Selley 55s 3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesRose Chrismon / Myra Propst vs Sandra Selley / Sandra Kimrey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Michelle Shoemaker
published
2.85
Sue White
published
2.85
Ila Rosenthal
published 3
2.83
Linda Chapman
published
2.74
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.69
Eleanor Redding
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.64
Lydia Nadel
published
2.50
Ann Fair
published 3
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Katy Vuncannon
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Shoemaker
13W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
2.97
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Linda Chapman
8W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Cindy Wood
10W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
Myra Propst
147W–178L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
2.64
3
Ann Fair
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
Katy Vuncannon
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.