Teams

Ouellette 40+ 3.0 Mixed

2025 Mixed 40&Over-PB · 3.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-06-16vs Canebrake 40 3.0 MixedWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaige Hutchinson / Rob Knight vs Chris Hester / Amy Evans6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlen Hajnal / Heather Reed vs JULIE BAUGH / Josh Thoms6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJason Boykin / Kristina Porcello vs Adam Franklin / Kristen Richardson0-6, 6-1, 1-0
2025-05-19vs Canebrake 40 3.0 MixedWon 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Holcomb / Rob Knight vs Susan Hamlett / Paul Drambar6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMachelle Weeks / Alen Hajnal vs Christi Dyess / Marshall G Dyess6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Reed / Roberto Amay vs JULIE BAUGH / Chris Hester6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Barbara Holcomb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Machelle Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Paige Hutchinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Alen Hajnal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.09
Nicole Toups
published
2.98
Mollie Warren
published
2.97
Rob Knight
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Roberto Amay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Jason Boykin
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jamie Boykin
published 3
2.75
Michael Ouellette
published
2.52
Tena Baine
published
Kristina Porcello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rob Knight + Machelle Weeks6065% games−1.8% vs expected
Machelle Weeks + Jason Boykin3259% gamesnot enough data
Nicole Toups + Jamie Boykin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Barbara Holcomb
77W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.52
Machelle Weeks
74W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.26
Paige Hutchinson
32W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Alen Hajnal
72W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Nicole Toups
39W–43L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.09
Mollie Warren
35W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
2.98
Rob Knight
33W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Roberto Amay
44W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Jason Boykin
60W–52L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Jamie Boykin
16W–23L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Ouellette
23W–30L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Tena Baine
18W–48L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
Kristina Porcello
2W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.