Teams

Mixed Hitters

2025 USTA MIXED 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

9 players · average NTRP 4.06 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-06vs Mixed ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Sliger / James Hart vs William Goslovich / Karen East6-4, 7-5
2025-07-30vs Strung Out 8.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Jameson / Brent Bradburn vs Mike O'Toole / Erin Kohler5-7, 2-6
2025-07-28vs Serve-ival SkillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrent Bradburn / Beth Jameson vs Colette van de Graaff / Ryan van de Graaff1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-23vs Pocket AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Sliger / James Hart vs Mark Graham / Colleen Schoeck4-6, 1-6
2025-07-21vs Mixed ShotsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Sliger / James Hart vs Andrea Reynolds / Jeremy Cramer6-4, 6-4
2025-07-09vs Serve-ival SkillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Sliger / James Hart vs Raymond Otto / Heather Baird6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocket Aces6216821196
2Strung Out 8.053141021211
3Mixed Hitters44131126233
4Serve-ival Skills3591533245
5Mixed Shots2681637251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Lisa Sliger
published 4.5
3.84
Beth Calvo
published 4
3.78
Brent Bradburn
published 4
3.78
Beth Jameson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Suzanne Baran
published 4
3.55
Joseph Higgins
published 4
3.54
Jennifer Colson
published 4
3.43
Terry Hardy
published 4
James Hart
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joseph Higgins + Suzanne Baran3442% games+0.3% vs expected
James Hart + Lisa Sliger81049% gamesnot enough data
Joseph Higgins + Terry Hardy033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lisa Sliger
141W–87L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
4
Beth Calvo
168W–125L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Brent Bradburn
135W–99L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Beth Jameson
121W–158L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Suzanne Baran
212W–163L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Joseph Higgins
90W–88L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
4
Jennifer Colson
93W–98L career · no lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.54
4
Terry Hardy
157W–231L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
James Hart
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.