Teams

Pocket Aces

2025 USTA MIXED 40 and OVER - BOISE · TV

20 players · average NTRP 4.05 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings5 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pocket Aces6216821196
2Strung Out 8.053141021211
3Mixed Hitters44131126233
4Serve-ival Skills3591533245
5Mixed Shots2681637251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Greg Ferney
published 5
4.45
Rebecca Newby
published 4.5
4.28
Mark Graham
published 4.5
4.28
Rachel Kincheloe
published 4.5
4.21
Bobette Wood
published 4.5
4.11
Matt Locke
published 4
4.03
Kayce McEwan
published 4
3.96
Krista Perry
published 4
3.95
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.94
Rick Roby
published 4
3.88
JJ Fuller
published 4.5
3.82
Robyn Roby
published 4
3.77
Nicole Hancock
published 4
3.75
Kirk Porritt
published 4
3.64
Eric Hallingstad
published 3.5
3.62
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.51
Anna Orrison
published 3.5
3.50
Chadd Cripe
published 3.5
3.30
Lori Ewing
published 3.5
3.27
Jon Hancock
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Hallingstad + Rachel Kincheloe7168% games+16.4% vs expected
Rick Roby + Robyn Roby341756% games+5.0% vs expected
Rebecca Newby + Rick Roby4547% games+4.2% vs expected
Jon Hancock + Nicole Hancock182150% games−4.7% vs expected
Chadd Cripe + Rachel Kincheloe4257% gamesnot enough data
Greg Ferney + Bobette Wood4162% gamesnot enough data
Brian Johnson + Robyn Roby4165% gamesnot enough data
Rebecca Newby + Matt Locke5070% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Greg Ferney
323W–106L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
4.47
4.5
Rebecca Newby
136W–52L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Mark Graham
130W–63L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Rachel Kincheloe
211W–79L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.28
4.5
Bobette Wood
280W–115L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
4.21
4
Matt Locke
63W–41L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
4.11
4
Kayce McEwan
147W–64L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Krista Perry
64W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Rick Roby
293W–104L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
JJ Fuller
186W–93L career · no lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
3.88
4
Robyn Roby
394W–189L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Kirk Porritt
221W–136L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Eric Hallingstad
146W–37L career · no lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.64
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–67L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Anna Orrison
242W–148L career · no lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Chadd Cripe
182W–98L career · no lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Lori Ewing
92W–137L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jon Hancock
56W–65L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.