Teams

MLF YELLOW

2023 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-16vs HMTC PINKWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Camille Benton vs Marcee Gustafson / Pat Richard5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Henninger / Teresa Nornes vs Diane Westlind / Sandra Overman6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesBettina Cosima Larrarte / Carol Geserick vs Marne Engelking / Ingrid Parsons2-6, 2-6
2023-06-09vs FHCC ORANGEWon 20
W#1 DoublesBettina Cosima Larrarte / Jessica Bergen vs Pam Smallwood / Milena Halek6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTeresa Nornes / Kristin Henninger vs Susan Kingsley / Shirley Bullinger3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-06-02vs LT BLUESplit 11
W#1 DoublesCamille Benton / Jessica Bergen vs Tina Spicer / Janet Krech7-6, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBettina Cosima Larrarte / Mariana Treat vs Debbie Stechman / Cathy Simocko-Smith4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-05-27vs CSU GREENSplit 11
L#2 DoublesTeresa Nornes / Kristin Henninger vs Lisa Martin / Maka Hammock6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMelissa Byrne / Bettina Cosima Larrarte vs Lori Rasmussen / Sara Hoff6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-12vs CSU GOLDSplit 11
W#2 DoublesCamille Benton / Leslie Taylor vs Michele MacHado / Mary Hulse6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCarol Geserick / Teresa Nornes vs Jamie Carlson / Leah Gavit2-6, 3-6
2023-05-05vs FCCC REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesCamille Benton / Leslie Taylor vs Jackie Spradley / Pam Raab3-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jill Brooks
published
3.25
Teresa Nornes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Camille Benton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.98
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jessica Bergen
published
Kristin Henninger
published
Mariana Treat
published
Melissa Byrne
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Brooks
34W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.60
3.5
Teresa Nornes
23W–30L career · 8 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Camille Benton
106W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
39W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%55%45%
2.98
Jessica Bergen
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristin Henninger
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mariana Treat
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Byrne
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.