Teams

TOC.Wahle

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-16vs PW.McClureWon 20
W#1 DoublesTerri Whitson / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJaime Nolan / Malinda Hain vs Lauren Spiegel / Sarah van Saun7-5, 6-2
2024-09-18vs TING.JohnstonLost 01
L#1 DoublesMalinda Hain / Sherry Hargrove vs Mary Griffiths / Jennifer Brock2-6, 5-7
2024-09-11vs PW.KraftLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoanna Valler / Rebecca Peart vs Kristen Bostian / Terri Levine3-6, 1-6
2024-09-04vs TOC.NealLost 02
L#1 DoublesMalinda Hain / Sherry Hargrove vs Krissy Campbell / Elizabeth Parrish3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSierra Luz / Kendall Ogren vs Cristina Middleton / Stacey Stephens1-6, 0-6
2024-09-03vs CAS.DeAngelisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMalinda Hain / Jaime Nolan vs Kelly Schomber / Sheri Lieffrig7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSierra Luz / Rebecca Peart vs Trish Dare / Catherine Chan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-08-21vs MD.KlingemanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoanna Valler / Malinda Hain vs Jennifer Alviano / Cheryl McCurdy2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-08-14vs TOC.MurphyLost 01
L#1 DoublesMalinda Hain / Karen Wahle vs Wendy Younkin / Lori Jee6-1, 6-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Malinda Hain
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.87
Jaime Nolan
published
2.86
Shannon Sikes
published
2.70
Terri Whitson
published
2.69
Joanna Valler
published
2.56
Sherry Hargrove
published
2.39
Jennifer Edmunds
published
2.37
Wendy Chen
published
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Rebecca Peart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.16
Kendall Ogren
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sierra Luz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Malinda Hain
59W–54L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jaime Nolan
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
Shannon Sikes
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.86
Terri Whitson
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
8%90%1%
2.70
Joanna Valler
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.69
Sherry Hargrove
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.56
Jennifer Edmunds
9W–27L career · no lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.39
Wendy Chen
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 1 line in 2024
0%93%7%
2.29
2.5
Rebecca Peart
30W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Kendall Ogren
11W–42L career · 1 line in 2024
0%99%1%
2.16
Sierra Luz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.