Teams

PW.McClure

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 40 & Over · Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-16vs TOC.WahleLost 01
L#2 DoublesLauren Spiegel / Sarah van Saun vs Jaime Nolan / Malinda Hain5-7, 2-6
2024-09-18vs CAS.DeAngelisLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Julie Ley vs Terri Jacobsen / Rossana Bolla2-6, 0-6
2024-09-11vs MD.KlingemanLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah van Saun / Brenna Magliulo vs Rochelle Roth / Cheryl McCurdy6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-09-04vs TOC.MurphyLost 01
L#3 DoublesLauren Spiegel / Sarah van Saun vs Wendy Younkin / Julie Pedraza1-6, 2-6
2024-08-28vs TOC.NealLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah van Saun / Amy Loyd vs Krissy Campbell / Stacey Stephens0-6, 0-6
2024-08-21vs TING.JohnstonLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Sarah van Saun vs Mary Griffiths / Jennifer Brock4-6, 1-6
2024-08-14vs PW.KraftLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah van Saun / Allison Lappin vs Courtney Osman / Allison Kupfrian3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Nishi Patel vs Penny Kraft / Janessa Core1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 40 & Over 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Sarah van Saun
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Cesely Smith
published 3
2.40
Smithey Hashagen
published
2.38
Nishi Patel
published
2.27
Lauren Spiegel
published
2.15
Brenna Magliulo
published 2.5
2.11
Jennifer McClure
published
2.02
Amy Dexheimer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Ley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Spiegel + Nishi Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Brenna Magliulo + Nishi Patel033 matchesnot enough data
Sarah van Saun + Amy Dexheimer033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sarah van Saun
74W–79L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Cesely Smith
0W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Smithey Hashagen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
Nishi Patel
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
Lauren Spiegel
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Brenna Magliulo
1W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.15
Jennifer McClure
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.11
2.5
Amy Dexheimer
21W–73L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julie Ley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.