Teams

Team 6

2021 NOVA Mixed 18 & Over · NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.92 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-02-14vs Team 3 Full Metal RacquetsWon 10
W#3 DoublesThomas McCrary / Heather Viar vs Zachary Launey / Alison Bouwmeester6-4, 5-4
2021-02-06vs Team 5 Nuts & HoneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJohnny Hsiung / Camryn Kim vs Devarshi Bhatt / Jennifer Fox6-0, 6-2
2021-01-22vs Team 2Won 10
W#3 DoublesThomas McCrary / Heather Viar vs David Cross / Katherine McCart3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-01-10Won 10
W#2 DoublesHeather Viar / Johnny Hsiung vs Nancy Riggins / Wil Riggins6-2, 6-1
2021-01-03vs Team 1 High RollersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJohnny Hsiung / Camryn Kim vs Annmarie Taggio / Muthukrishnan Ganesan6-3, 6-2
2020-12-27vs Team 2Lost 01
L#3 DoublesHeather Viar / Don Kim vs Jamie Sheen / ZACHARY MOFFATT6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2020-12-19vs Team 8 Shades of BlueLost 01
L#3 DoublesJill Janecek / Johnny Hsiung vs Denise Warburton / Ronald Oberbillig6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2020-12-13Lost 01
L#2 DoublesNathan Bergman / Heather Viar vs John Doe / Jennifer Fox4-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Soheil Shirzadi
published
4.24
Heather Viar
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
3.95
Johnny Hsiung
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.86
Cameron Craig
published 4
3.85
Camryn Kim
published 4
3.68
David Viar
published 3.5
3.65
Paul Lluy
published
3.49
Nancy Rowland
published
3.39
Jacquelin Lluy
published 3.5
3.01
Thomas McCrary
published
John Lee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Craig + Thomas McCrary5557% games−16.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Soheil Shirzadi
17W–8L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Heather Viar
239W–145L career · 7 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
4.24
4
Johnny Hsiung
573W–156L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Cameron Craig
44W–39L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Camryn Kim
8W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
3.85
3.5
David Viar
39W–19L career · no lines in 2021
<1%8%92%
3.68
Paul Lluy
21W–13L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.65
Nancy Rowland
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jacquelin Lluy
43W–32L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%20%
3.39
Thomas McCrary
43W–39L career · no lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.01
John Lee
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.