Teams

OC Classy on the Court - LPC- Mak

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-07vs OC - Los Cab - Ching/ Sat 11amWon 20
W#1 DoublesSu Prijyanonda / Elaine Schwarz vs Susan Omeara / Cynthia Turner4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSabrina MacLachlan vs Cathy Sejansky6-2, 6-0
2021-08-01vs OC - CMTC - DeeWon 21
L#1 DoublesKarissa Do / Hina Khan vs Mary Thomas / Rachel de Los Santos5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSabrina MacLachlan vs Lorri Watson6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMelani Meekhof / Su Prijyanonda vs Rikki Scharnell / Lea Tamblyn6-2, 6-2
2021-07-25vs OC 40 Love - LPC - DiekneitWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelani Meekhof / Sabrina MacLachlan vs Elizabeth Frost / Keiko Takahashi6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSu Prijyanonda / Keri Long vs Sharon Diekneit / Mai Gu6-4, 6-1
W#4 DoublesMichele Savoie / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Julia Gissel / Rosanne Oddo6-3, 6-1
2021-07-10vs OC Seacliff - Gates Sat 12:30Won 30
W#1 SinglesSabrina MacLachlan vs Rosalinda Fazio6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichele Savoie / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Catherine Riegler / Laurette Jennings6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesMaria Mayberry / Su Prijyanonda vs Lisa Rhoads / Josephine Garrett6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesKarissa Do / Su Prijyanonda vs Vera Garrard / Jenna van der Meyden1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#4 DoublesSabrina MacLachlan / Vivian Kang vs Gamble Yeung / Julia Lin6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Su Prijyanonda
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.96
Karissa Do
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Michele Savoie
published
3.71
Sabrina MacLachlan
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #4 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.70
Julie Mak
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Savoie + Sabrina MacLachlan8353% games+6.0% vs expected
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits + Karissa Do3255% gamesnot enough data
Sabrina MacLachlan + Su Prijyanonda213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Su Prijyanonda
85W–38L career · 5 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
4.12
4
Karissa Do
90W–75L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
Michele Savoie
21W–14L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Sabrina MacLachlan
190W–130L career · 5 lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Julie Mak
4W–3L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.