Teams

OC 40 Love - LPC - Diekneit

2021 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Women WE - 4.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.62 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-08-08vs OC Seacliff - Gates Sat 12:30Lost 02
L#1 SinglesSharon Diekneit vs Emalyn Anthony0-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJulia Gissel / Rosanne Oddo vs Nancy Stephens / Teri Springer4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGina Bernal / Julia Gissel vs Stephanie Chung / Mary DeVlugt2-6, 0-6
2021-07-25vs OC Classy on the Court - LPC- MakLost 03
L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Mai Gu vs Su Prijyanonda / Keri Long4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Hull / Gina Bernal vs Vivian Kang / Maria Mayberry4-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesJulia Gissel / Rosanne Oddo vs Michele Savoie / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits3-6, 1-6
2021-07-18vs OC - Los Cab - Ching/ Sat 11amLost 02
L#1 SinglesSharon Diekneit vs Cathy Sejansky0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Hull / Gina Bernal vs Vicki Brown / Kerry Wessel2-6, 3-6
2021-07-11vs OC - CMTC - DeeLost 12
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Frost / Julie Hull vs Mary Thomas / Indrani Jackson0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSharon Diekneit / Kelly Hogan vs Rikki Scharnell / Lea Tamblyn2-6, 4-6
W#4 DoublesMelissa Gilbert / Julia Gissel vs Dee Harriman / Rachel de Los Santos2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Julie Hull
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Kelly Hogan
published
3.53
Mai Gu
published
3.30
Julia Gissel
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Sharon Diekneit
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Elizabeth Frost
published 3.5
3.03
Noriko Imai
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Diekneit + Julia Gissel141255% games−6.7% vs expected
Sharon Diekneit + Julie Hull044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Julie Hull
94W–108L career · 3 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
3.61
Kelly Hogan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
Mai Gu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Julia Gissel
34W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Sharon Diekneit
186W–204L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Elizabeth Frost
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Noriko Imai
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
42%58%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.