Teams

V - WACky Ranchers

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over · Ventura - Men 4.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-12-12vs V - Sunset HillsWon 10
W#1 DoublesGary Lieb / Peter Corbitt vs Eric Dyer / Adam Nielson7-5, 7-5
2021-11-20vs V - Wood RanchWon 10
W#1 DoublesJaime Barajas / Gary Lieb vs Cedric Cornilliet / Martin Lotz7-5, 6-3
2021-11-06vs V - LLW-Spanish Hills-ChioWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Lieb / Peter Corbitt vs Richard Geib / Daniel Valdez0-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-10-31vs V - Oxnard TCWon 10
W#2 DoublesGary Lieb / Peter Corbitt vs Vikrum Nanda / Brent Wakatsuki6-2, 6-3
2021-10-23vs V - Sunset HillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesWilliam Charters / Gary Lieb vs Eric Dyer / Mark Sherwood6-3, 6-3
2021-10-17vs V - Wood RanchWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrant Benun / Gary Lieb vs Martin Lotz / Jonathan Fersht0-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Brant Benun
published 4.5
4.45
Kevin Marks
published
4.30
Gary Lieb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Jaime Barajas
published 4.5
4.07
William Charters
published
3.95
Keith Lippiatt
published
3.95
Nathan Stockmeir
published
3.86
Dave Solomon
published 4
Adam Kane
published 4
Bob Benton
published 4
3.68
Shane Marshak
published
Neal Marks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Solomon + Shane Marshak224 matchesnot enough data
Jaime Barajas + Brant Benun123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brant Benun
17W–14L career · no lines in 2021
<1%60%40%
4.47
Kevin Marks
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
4.45
4.5
Gary Lieb
77W–50L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Jaime Barajas
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
4.16
William Charters
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
4.07
Keith Lippiatt
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
64%36%<1%
3.95
Nathan Stockmeir
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Dave Solomon
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Adam Kane
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Bob Benton
10W–4L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shane Marshak
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
9%91%1%
3.68
Neal Marks
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.