Teams

V - Oxnard TC

2021 SoCal Doubles 18 &Over · Ventura - Men 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.58 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-12-05vs V - LLW-Spanish Hills-ChioWon 10
W#3 DoublesCarson Ludwig / Andrew Riccitelli vs William Torrence / Julio Cabral3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-11-14vs V - Sunset HillsWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristopher Wan / Carson Ludwig vs James Wong / Pat Johnson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrent Wakatsuki / Shane McNulty vs David Spellerberg / Thanh Nguyen6-4, 6-1
2021-10-31vs V - WACky RanchersLost 01
L#2 DoublesVikrum Nanda / Brent Wakatsuki vs Gary Lieb / Peter Corbitt2-6, 3-6
2021-10-24vs V - LLW-Spanish Hills-ChioLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrent Wakatsuki / Andrew Riccitelli vs Richard Geib / Vance Boucher4-6, 2-6
2021-10-02vs V - Sunset HillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Tovar / Carson Ludwig vs Sonny Romero / Thanh Nguyen5-7, 6-7
2021-09-26vs V - Wood RanchWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrent Wakatsuki / Shane McNulty vs Brandon Su / Tom Oswalt6-2, 6-4
2021-09-18vs V - WACky RanchersLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarson Ludwig / Vikrum Nanda vs Shane Marshak / Randy Lee7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Men 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christopher Wan
published 5
4.25
Ryan Rollins
published
4.24
Carter Erickson
published 4.5
4.21
Darryl Huen
published 4.5
4.20
David Tovar
published 4.5
4.18
Brent Wakatsuki
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Vikrum Nanda
published
3.84
Carson Ludwig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Shane McNulty
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Wakatsuki + Carson Ludwig10856% games+6.8% vs expected
Brent Wakatsuki + Carter Erickson3260% games+5.7% vs expected
Ryan Rollins + Carson Ludwig033 matchesnot enough data
David Tovar + Carson Ludwig033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Christopher Wan
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Ryan Rollins
4W–6L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Carter Erickson
11W–14L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Darryl Huen
11W–11L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.21
4.5
David Tovar
3W–9L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Brent Wakatsuki
107W–113L career · 4 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Vikrum Nanda
5W–2L career · no lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Carson Ludwig
56W–62L career · 4 lines in 2021
88%12%<1%
3.84
Shane McNulty
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.