Teams

AU - Riley

2025 Auburn USTA Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 4.0 Adult 55 & Over Women

9 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-18vs Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Riley / Stacy Pease vs Deena Davis / Chris Shoener6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKathryn Barrett / Kate Irwin vs Mary Ellen Thomson / Joanna Diller6-4, 6-4
2025-03-08vs Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesStacy Pease / Heidi Hulon vs Chris Shoener / Kristin Adams6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKathryn Barrett / Donna Sinor vs Joanna Diller / Mary Ellen Thomson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJo Frinak / Robin Weyant vs Marquita Cocke / Jayne Gunter6-2, 6-4
2025-03-01vs Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Riley / Jo Frinak vs Mary Ellen Thomson / Sheri Todd6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hulon / Kathryn Barrett vs Joanna Diller / Deena Davis6-4, 6-3
2025-02-22vs Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesKim Riley / Stacy Pease vs Jayne Gunter / Joanna Diller6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesHeidi Hulon / Donna Sinor vs Sheri Todd / Susan Mossholder1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRegina Fernicola / Kate Irwin vs Kristin Adams / Chris Shoener6-4, 6-1
2025-02-15vs Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesKim Riley / Heidi Hulon vs Sheri Todd / Jayne Gunter6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Weyant / Katie Gerst vs Marquita Cocke / Joanna Diller6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Katie Gerst
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Regina Fernicola
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Jo Frinak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Laura Worthy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.27
Stacy Pease
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Kate Irwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.11
Robin Weyant
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Heidi Hulon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Donna Sinor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Gerst
33W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Regina Fernicola
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.55
Jo Frinak
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
Laura Worthy
24W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Stacy Pease
24W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.27
Kate Irwin
34W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.13
Robin Weyant
17W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Heidi Hulon
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
Donna Sinor
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.