Teams

Mary Ellen Thomson-YTC-55+-4.0

2025 Auburn USTA Adult 55 & Over Spring League · 4.0 Adult 55 & Over Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-18vs AU - RileyLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeena Davis / Chris Shoener vs Kim Riley / Stacy Pease3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Ellen Thomson / Joanna Diller vs Kathryn Barrett / Kate Irwin4-6, 4-6
2025-03-08vs AU - RileyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Shoener / Kristin Adams vs Stacy Pease / Heidi Hulon0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoanna Diller / Mary Ellen Thomson vs Kathryn Barrett / Donna Sinor2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarquita Cocke / Jayne Gunter vs Jo Frinak / Robin Weyant2-6, 4-6
2025-03-01vs AU - RileyLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Ellen Thomson / Sheri Todd vs Kim Riley / Jo Frinak4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJoanna Diller / Deena Davis vs Heidi Hulon / Kathryn Barrett4-6, 3-6
2025-02-22vs AU - RileyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJayne Gunter / Joanna Diller vs Kim Riley / Stacy Pease1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSheri Todd / Susan Mossholder vs Heidi Hulon / Donna Sinor6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKristin Adams / Chris Shoener vs Regina Fernicola / Kate Irwin4-6, 1-6
2025-02-15vs AU - RileyLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheri Todd / Jayne Gunter vs Kim Riley / Heidi Hulon4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMarquita Cocke / Joanna Diller vs Robin Weyant / Katie Gerst1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 55 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Chris Shoener
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.15
Deena Davis
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Jayne Gunter
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Joanna Diller
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Marquita Cocke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mary Ellen Thomson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sheri Todd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Susan Mossholder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chris Shoener
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deena Davis
16W–14L career · 7 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Jayne Gunter
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanna Diller
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Marquita Cocke
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mary Ellen Thomson
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheri Todd
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Susan Mossholder
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.