Teams

Tri Again

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs H's Hotties TrilevelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Natalia Illich vs Laura DeHaan / Harriet Cregann4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNivea Urdaneta / Zilya Ruga vs Valeska Dykes / Michele Girardi6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2025-09-28vs The Sweet ShotsWon 21
W#1 DoublesMartina Kralickova / Svetlana Janglin vs Lara Slatniske / Anna Livingston6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Fischer / Natalie Hensgen vs Nelci Rodrigues / Pippin Gilbert2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmonrut Jaimoon / Zilya Ruga vs Lara Jackson / Lisa Nero2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-09-27vs St. Pete TriSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSvetlana Janglin / Martina Kralickova vs Terry West / Johanna Pruitt6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesNivea Urdaneta / Zilya Ruga vs Teena Augostino / Susan Felten0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesLisa Oonk / Natalia Illich vs Uri Covarrubias / Julia van Diver6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDebbie Dawson / Natalie Hensgen vs Terry Wilson / Fan Wang5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Lisa Oonk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Svetlana Janglin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Martina Kralickova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Natalia Illich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.44
Emily Signoracci
published
3.34
Debbie Dawson
published 3.5
3.29
Natalie Hensgen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Karen Fischer
published
3.03
Amonrut Jaimoon
published 3
3.00
Zilya Ruga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Martha Chapman
published
Nivea Urdaneta
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Svetlana Janglin + Martina Kralickova8456% games−5.0% vs expected
Lisa Oonk + Natalia Illich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Oonk
217W–231L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Svetlana Janglin
98W–111L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Martina Kralickova
91W–63L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Natalia Illich
80W–53L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.68
Emily Signoracci
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Debbie Dawson
18W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Natalie Hensgen
29W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Karen Fischer
5W–12L career · no lines in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Amonrut Jaimoon
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Zilya Ruga
42W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Martha Chapman
19W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Nivea Urdaneta
26W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.