Teams

H's Hotties Trilevel

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-28vs Average JoesLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnne Remie / Christine Campbell vs Kim Williams / Brianna Arnold4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-09-27vs The Sweet ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristine Campbell / Anne Remie vs Nelci Rodrigues / Pippin Gilbert5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Amy Brooks
published 4
3.86
Laura DeHaan
published
3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.56
Harriet Cregann
published 4
3.35
Deborah Larsen
published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Genovese
published
3.29
Anne Remie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.22
Christine Campbell
published 3.5
2.99
Valeska Dykes
published
2.94
Michele Girardi
published
2.81
Asheley Wardell
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valeska Dykes + Michele Girardi13266% games+8.7% vs expected
Laura DeHaan + Harriet Cregann2349% games+0.1% vs expected
Allison Guerra + Amy Brooks4356% games−1.3% vs expected
Kristine Genovese + Deborah Larsen3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Brooks
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.87
Laura DeHaan
19W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Harriet Cregann
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Deborah Larsen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
3.35
Kristine Genovese
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Anne Remie
136W–73L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christine Campbell
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.22
Valeska Dykes
20W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
2.99
Michele Girardi
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3
Asheley Wardell
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.