Teams

Average Joes

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs SweetshotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLita Hollister / Kelly Depalo vs Alicia Castaneda / Monica Sanchez1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesPrathima Kothapalli / Nicki Chong vs Chloe Wiard / Frances Skinner6-2, 6-1
2025-09-28vs H's Hotties TrilevelLost 01
L#1 DoublesLita Hollister / LaMonica Lovett vs Amy Brooks / Laura DeHaan3-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesKelly Depalo / Elsa Trefil vs Ivana West / Djurdja Lukovic1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaMonica Lovett / Esthela Gonzalez vs Ronghui You / Min Long2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPrathima Kothapalli / Dominica Olive vs Anne Orwa / Wei Xue1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-27vs Worth A TriLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoan Whitten / LaMonica Lovett vs Sigrid Bratic / Morgan Domson2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez vs Karen Braudis / Kathleen Annichiarico3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Kelly Depalo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Elsa Trefil
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Joan Whitten
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Lita Hollister
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
LaMonica Lovett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.25
Esthela Gonzalez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Brianna Arnold
published 3.5
3.10
Nicki Chong
published
3.08
Dominica Olive
published
2.91
Prathima Kothapalli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
Tiffany Hashem
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

LaMonica Lovett + Joan Whitten5455% gamesnot enough data
Kelly Depalo + Elsa Trefil1542% gamesnot enough data
Esthela Gonzalez + Joan Whitten033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kelly Depalo
74W–104L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Elsa Trefil
71W–103L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
3.5
Joan Whitten
182W–137L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
4
Lita Hollister
78W–113L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
LaMonica Lovett
51W–59L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Esthela Gonzalez
127W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Brianna Arnold
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Nicki Chong
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Dominica Olive
29W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Prathima Kothapalli
43W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Tiffany Hashem
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.