Teams

Sweetshots

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.60 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-28vs Average JoesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMartha Cornatzer / Gail Stallwood vs Kim Williams / Brianna Arnold6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-09-28vs St. Pete TriWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Pawlowski / Laura Wetzel vs Ellen Johnson / Johanna Pruitt6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNoela Fries / Amy Burns vs Melinda Hart / Anne McDaniels0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGabriela Tanase / Tracia Danhour vs Brandy Fernandez / Paula Eurich2-6, 0-6
2025-09-27vs The Sweet ShotsWon 10
W#2 DoublesGail Stallwood / Martha Cornatzer vs Trisha Shirkey / Joanne Law0-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Laura Wetzel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.82
Alicia Castaneda
published 4
3.81
Cheryl Pawlowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Monica Sanchez
published
3.17
Amy Burns
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Martha Cornatzer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Noela Fries
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Chloe Wiard
published 3
2.78
Gabriela Tanase
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Frances Skinner
published
2.55
Tracia Danhour
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gail Stallwood
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alicia Castaneda + Monica Sanchez7353% games−0.6% vs expected
Laura Wetzel + Cheryl Pawlowski10454% games−2.8% vs expected
Tracia Danhour + Chloe Wiard033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Wetzel
17W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Alicia Castaneda
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cheryl Pawlowski
15W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
Monica Sanchez
27W–22L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
3.5
Amy Burns
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Martha Cornatzer
117W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.06
Noela Fries
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Chloe Wiard
11W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Gabriela Tanase
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Frances Skinner
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Tracia Danhour
5W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.55
Gail Stallwood
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.