Teams

Worth A Tri

2025 Pinellas IN Trilevel 18 & Over Fall · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-28vs St. Pete TriWon 20
W#1 DoublesMorgan Domson / Sigrid Bratic vs Terry West / Virginie Khare6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKathleen Annichiarico / Karen Braudis vs Carol Vitelli / Ann Worthington6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Gerlach / Kirsten Willis vs Julia van Diver / Uri Covarrubias6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLiwen Tao / Laura Hungiville vs Fan Wang / Terry Wilson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLee Cucchi / Robyn Houston vs Wendy Dobreff / Susan MOSHER1-6, 0-6
2025-09-27vs Average JoesWon 30
W#1 DoublesSigrid Bratic / Morgan Domson vs Joan Whitten / LaMonica Lovett6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Braudis / Kathleen Annichiarico vs Kim Williams / Esthela Gonzalez6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRobyn Houston / Lee Cucchi vs Tiffany Hashem / Dominica Olive7-5, 6-3
2025-09-27vs SweetshotsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKirsten Willis / Elizabeth Gerlach vs Cheryl Pawlowski / Laura Wetzel6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLaura Hungiville / Liwen Tao - * vs Noela Fries / Amy Burns7-5, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Elizabeth Gerlach
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Kirsten Willis
published
3.84
Sigrid Bratic
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Morgan Domson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.32
Laura Hungiville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Karen Braudis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Maresol Wehner
published
2.85
Robyn Houston
published
2.73
Lee Cucchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Tammy Miller
published
Liwen Tao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Braudis + Sigrid Bratic16360% games+6.8% vs expected
Sigrid Bratic + Morgan Domson331157% games+3.4% vs expected
Robyn Houston + Lee Cucchi7556% games−1.4% vs expected
Karen Braudis + Morgan Domson2352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elizabeth Gerlach
184W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
4.08
Kirsten Willis
10W–15L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Sigrid Bratic
124W–65L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.84
4
Morgan Domson
68W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
3.5
Laura Hungiville
67W–119L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Karen Braudis
36W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Maresol Wehner
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Robyn Houston
18W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
2.85
3
Lee Cucchi
53W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Tammy Miller
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Kathleen Annichiarico
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Liwen Tao
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.