Teams

ETC:Deuce Divas: Bombich

2026 WMA Adult 18 & Over Women Spring · 2.5 Women 1

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-31vs ETC:Match Makers:Houser/LoganLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Bombich / Stephanie Pellegrini vs Amy Veres / Ashley Sadowsky4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRobyn Sondak vs Rachel Logan1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Spatcher / Narae Mcmanus vs Mary Beth Kronick / Brittany Losee6-4, 6-1
2026-05-17vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Pellegrini / Robyn Sondak vs Kimberly Okey / Laura Whittemore3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Glybin vs Cheryl Signet1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Bombich / Narae Mcmanus vs Rani AThreya / Udaya Jagadeesan6-3, 6-0
2026-04-26vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepLost 03
L#1 DoublesMolly Spatcher / Robyn Sondak vs Michelle Sullivan / Cynthia Leveillee6-3, 6-7, 1-4
L#1 SinglesJulia Glybin vs Kristin Carnahan4-6, 1-3
L#2 DoublesNarae Mcmanus / Allison Giddings vs DeeDee Grinstead / Mary Cahillane6-4, 2-6, 4-2
2026-04-12vs ETC:Match Makers:Houser/LoganLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnnette Scheidecker / Stephanie Pellegrini vs Cate Dowd / Alana Furnari2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesSarah Bombich vs Rachel Logan4-6, 7-5, 0-3
W#2 DoublesMolly Spatcher / Traci Leary vs Mary Beth Kronick / Brittany Losee6-3, 6-2
2026-03-29vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaWon 21
W#1 DoublesStephanie Pellegrini / Annette Scheidecker vs Tara Garstka / Cheryl Signet7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJulia Glybin vs Melissa Candon1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesNarae Mcmanus / Robyn Sondak vs Kristina Mentuck / Kimberly Okey6-1, 5-7, 6-1
2026-03-22vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnnette Scheidecker / Sarah Bombich vs Rachel Combe / Kara Conway4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJulia Glybin vs Natalee Georgantas2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Pellegrini / Traci Leary vs Paula Welch / Karla Shea5-7, 2-6
2026-03-08vs ETC:Match Makers:Houser/LoganWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnette Scheidecker / Narae Mcmanus vs Mary Beth Kronick / Rachel Logan7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMolly Spatcher vs Ashley Sadowsky3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRobyn Sondak / Sarah Bombich vs Cate Dowd / Molly Houser6-4, 6-3
2026-02-28vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Pellegrini / Annette Scheidecker vs Cheryl Signet / Tara Garstka6-4, 3-6, 3-2
L#1 SinglesMolly Spatcher vs Melissa Candon1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Bombich / Traci Leary vs Kimberly Okey / Samantha Root3-6, 5-7
2026-02-07vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephanie Pellegrini / Robyn Sondak vs Rachel Combe / Cynthia Leveillee6-0, 1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesTraci Leary vs Nancy Paulides4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAllison Giddings / Molly Spatcher vs Mary Cahillane / Paula Welch4-6, 6-2, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/Garstka6318925239
2LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/Polep63171025242
3ETC:Match Makers:Houser/Logan45121535286
4ETC:Deuce Divas: Bombich2772041290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.17 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Stephanie Pellegrini
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.35
Molly Spatcher
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.34
Narae Mcmanus
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.19
Sarah Bombich
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Traci Leary
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.13
Annette Scheidecker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.13
Robyn Sondak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.05
Julia Glybin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
1.82
Allison Giddings
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Pellegrini + Annette Scheidecker31636% games−4.3% vs expected
Robyn Sondak + Annette Scheidecker1840% games−7.7% vs expected
Allison Giddings + Narae Mcmanus044 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Pellegrini + Robyn Sondak033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Pellegrini
9W–47L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.36
Molly Spatcher
8W–7L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.35
Narae Mcmanus
10W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Sarah Bombich
16W–26L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Traci Leary
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
2.5
Annette Scheidecker
36W–86L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Robyn Sondak
43W–111L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Julia Glybin
4W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Allison Giddings
0W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.