Teams

ETC:Match Makers:Houser/Logan

2026 WMA Adult 18 & Over Women Spring · 2.5 Women 1

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-31vs ETC:Deuce Divas: BombichWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmy Veres / Ashley Sadowsky vs Sarah Bombich / Stephanie Pellegrini6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesRachel Logan vs Robyn Sondak6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Kronick / Brittany Losee vs Molly Spatcher / Narae Mcmanus4-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAdriane Levy vs Jamie Polep6-4, 3-6, 2-4
W#2 DoublesMolly Houser / Ashley Weiss vs Rachel Combe / DeeDee Grinstead4-6, 6-3, 4-2
2026-05-03vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepLost 12
W#1 DoublesMolly Houser / Ashley Sadowsky vs Kara Conway / Rachel Combe6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Logan vs Natalee Georgantas3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCate Dowd / Mary Beth Kronick vs DeeDee Grinstead / Michelle Sullivan2-6, 0-6
2026-04-26vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Kronick / Alana Furnari vs Melissa Candon / Toni Wall6-3, 2-6, 4-3
L#1 SinglesRachel Logan vs Tara Garstka3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrittany Losee / Ashley Weiss vs Kristina Mentuck / Samantha Root6-4, 6-4
2026-04-12vs ETC:Deuce Divas: BombichWon 21
W#1 DoublesCate Dowd / Alana Furnari vs Annette Scheidecker / Stephanie Pellegrini6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel Logan vs Sarah Bombich6-4, 5-7, 3-0
L#2 DoublesMary Beth Kronick / Brittany Losee vs Molly Spatcher / Traci Leary3-6, 2-6
2026-04-04vs LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/PolepLost 12
W#1 DoublesAshley Sadowsky / Rachel Logan vs Rachel Combe / Nancy Paulides6-3, 2-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAdriane Levy vs Jamie Polep1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Veres / Ashley Weiss vs Mary Cahillane / Silvia Scott3-6, 2-6
2026-03-22vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlana Furnari / Molly Houser vs Laura Whittemore / Samantha Root6-0, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAmy Veres vs Toni Wall0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMary Beth Kronick / Brittany Losee vs Kimberly Okey / Kristina Mentuck4-6, 6-2, 6-1
2026-03-08vs ETC:Deuce Divas: BombichLost 12
L#1 DoublesMary Beth Kronick / Rachel Logan vs Annette Scheidecker / Narae Mcmanus6-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesAshley Sadowsky vs Molly Spatcher6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCate Dowd / Molly Houser vs Robyn Sondak / Sarah Bombich4-6, 3-6
2026-02-07vs ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/GarstkaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAshley Weiss / Brittany Losee vs Laura Whittemore / Udaya Jagadeesan2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRachel Logan vs Cheryl Signet6-7, 6-3, 2-3
L#2 DoublesMolly Houser / Mary Beth Kronick vs Samantha Root / Toni Wall3-6, 6-3, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ETC:Honey Deuces:Cignet/Garstka6318925239
2LTC:Volley Vixens:Cahillane/Polep63171025242
3ETC:Match Makers:Houser/Logan45121535286
4ETC:Deuce Divas: Bombich2772041290

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.45
Rachel Logan
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.44
Alana Furnari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Ashley Sadowsky
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Adriane Levy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.26
Molly Houser
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.21
Mary Beth Kronick
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.19
Cate Dowd
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.13
Amy Veres
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.10
Ashley Weiss
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.04
Brittany Losee
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Beth Kronick + Brittany Losee123 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Sadowsky + Molly Houser303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Logan
4W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Alana Furnari
6W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Ashley Sadowsky
9W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Adriane Levy
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Molly Houser
6W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
Mary Beth Kronick
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Cate Dowd
3W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
2.5
Amy Veres
10W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
2.5
Ashley Weiss
2W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Brittany Losee
2W–3L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.