Teams

WNCA Deeter (ARC S)

Adult 40 & Over USTA WNC 2025 · 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-20vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Won 21
W#1 DoublesNicole Ingle / Quenton Wright vs Zsuzsanna Brooks / Mindy Nelson6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesElaine Dephouse / Eileen Cohen vs Lisbeth Scharf / Nancy Izzo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Darcey Kennedy vs Holly Renfro / Bethany Smith-Martin5-7, 3-6
2025-04-15vs WNCD Andrews (ARC S)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAdriane Deeter / Nicole Ingle vs Alice Chen / Christine Carson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJodi DeVerges / Eileen Cohen vs Kara Candler / Mindy Nelson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesElaine Dephouse / Darcey Kennedy vs Nancy Izzo / Lisbeth Scharf6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & O 3.5 Women Tuesday & Friday evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Adriane Deeter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Quenton Wright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Darcey Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Nicole Ingle
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.31
Elaine Dephouse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Mary Freeman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Lee Lowe
published
3.01
Eileen Cohen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Jenifer Bolton
published
Elizabeth Etheridge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Summerlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jodi DeVerges
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eileen Cohen + Elaine Dephouse2435% games−8.5% vs expected
Lee Lowe + Darcey Kennedy303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Adriane Deeter
26W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
3.47
Quenton Wright
23W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Darcey Kennedy
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Nicole Ingle
19W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Elaine Dephouse
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Mary Freeman
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Lee Lowe
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
Eileen Cohen
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jenifer Bolton
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
Elizabeth Etheridge
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Summerlin
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jodi DeVerges
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.